California 2019-2020 Regular Session

California Assembly Bill AB394

Introduced
2/6/19  
Introduced
2/6/19  
Refer
2/15/19  
Report Pass
4/1/19  
Report Pass
4/1/19  
Refer
4/3/19  
Refer
4/3/19  
Report Pass
4/10/19  
Report Pass
4/10/19  
Engrossed
4/22/19  
Refer
4/23/19  
Refer
5/1/19  
Refer
5/1/19  
Report Pass
6/12/19  
Report Pass
6/12/19  
Refer
6/13/19  
Refer
6/13/19  
Report Pass
8/12/19  
Report Pass
8/12/19  
Refer
8/13/19  
Refer
8/13/19  
Refer
8/26/19  
Refer
8/26/19  
Report Pass
8/30/19  
Report Pass
8/30/19  
Enrolled
9/11/19  
Vetoed
10/2/19  

Caption

California Environmental Quality Act: exemption: egress route projects: fire safety.

Impact

The legislation fundamentally alters how public agencies approach fire safety issues related to egress routes in vulnerable subdivisions. By providing an exemption from CEQA for these projects, AB 394 facilitates faster responses to fire safety concerns, potentially leading to improved public safety. The bill also mandates that agencies hold a public meeting to discuss proposed projects, ensuring some level of community engagement despite the expedited process. This provision aims to balance the urgency of fire safety needs with the need for public input.

Summary

Assembly Bill 394, introduced by Assembly Member Obernolte, amends the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) to exempt specific fire safety egress projects from certain environmental review requirements. This bill permits public agencies to execute egress route projects that improve the fire safety of subdivisions identified as having insufficient evacuation routes, particularly in areas classified as high or very high fire hazard severity zones. The exemption is set to remain in effect until January 1, 2025, under the condition that several environmental protections are still in place.

Sentiment

The sentiment around AB 394 appears to be largely supportive among proponents of quick action on fire safety, including many public officials and safety advocates. They argue that the bill addresses critical gaps in community safety, particularly in the wake of increasingly severe fire seasons. However, there are concerns voiced by environmentalists who fear that the exemptions could bypass essential environmental protections and lead to unintended consequences, such as damaging local ecosystems or compromising other protective regulations.

Contention

Notable points of contention include the potential for the bill to dilute environmental safeguards established under CEQA. Critics argue that while responding promptly to fire safety concerns is crucial, it should not come at the cost of long-term environmental health. There is also debate about whether the conditions set forth to qualify for the exemption adequately protect against negatively impacting wetlands, endangered species, and archaeological resources within the areas impacted by the proposed egress route improvements.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA AB1154

California Environmental Quality Act: exemption: egress route projects: fire safety.

CA AB692

California Environmental Quality Act: exemption: egress route projects: fire safety.

CA AB66

California Environmental Quality Act: exemption: egress route projects: fire safety.

CA SB576

Coastal resources: Climate Ready Program and coastal climate change adaptation, infrastructure, and readiness program.

CA AB2371

Climate change: Office of Planning and Research: science advisory team: climate adaptation and hazard mitigation.

CA AB2323

California Environmental Quality Act: exemptions.

CA SB253

Cannella Environmental Farming Act of 1995: Environmental Farming Incentive Program.

CA AB1901

California Environmental Quality Act: exemption: roadway projects.