California 2019-2020 Regular Session

California Assembly Bill AB545

Introduced
2/13/19  
Introduced
2/13/19  
Refer
2/25/19  
Refer
2/25/19  
Report Pass
4/2/19  
Refer
4/2/19  
Refer
4/2/19  
Report Pass
4/10/19  
Report Pass
4/10/19  
Engrossed
4/25/19  
Engrossed
4/25/19  
Refer
4/25/19  
Refer
4/25/19  
Refer
5/8/19  
Report Pass
5/28/19  
Report Pass
5/28/19  
Refer
5/28/19  
Refer
5/28/19  
Report Pass
6/10/19  
Report Pass
6/10/19  
Refer
6/10/19  
Refer
6/10/19  
Refer
6/24/19  
Report Pass
8/30/19  
Report Pass
8/30/19  
Enrolled
8/31/20  
Enrolled
8/31/20  
Vetoed
9/24/20  

Caption

Cannabis: Bureau of Cannabis Control.

Impact

If enacted, AB 545 would amend existing statutes to allow legislative oversight over the Bureau of Cannabis Control by including it under the regular review process similar to other state agencies. The Bureau regulates all aspects of cannabis control within the state, including licensing and compliance. By removing the exemption, this bill would ensure that the operations of the Bureau are evaluated regularly to determine their continued efficacy in managing the cannabis industry, thus enhancing transparency and efficiency in state governance.

Summary

Assembly Bill 545, introduced by Assembly Member Low, focuses on the oversight and regulation of cannabis activities in California, specifically by the Bureau of Cannabis Control. The bill aims to require the Bureau's powers and duties to be subject to legislative review by the relevant policy committees, which is a shift from prior provisions that exempted the Bureau from such scrutiny. This change aligns with efforts to enhance accountability and ensure that the Bureau’s practices remain effective and necessary within the evolving landscape of cannabis regulation under the Medicinal and Adult-Use Cannabis Regulation and Safety Act (MAUCRSA).

Sentiment

The general sentiment surrounding AB 545 appears to be supportive among legislators advocating for greater oversight and efficiency in government operations. However, there may be concerns from those within the cannabis industry about potential additional regulatory burdens that could be imposed as a result of increased scrutiny. Overall, the discussions have highlighted a desire for responsibility in managing cannabis regulations effectively, while balancing the need to foster a healthy business environment for cannabis enterprises.

Contention

Notable points of contention regarding AB 545 center around the implications of enhanced legislative oversight and whether such measures might lead to excessive bureaucracy or hinder the Bureau’s ability to respond quickly to the dynamic nature of the cannabis market. There are also discussions on the potential benefits of ensuring that state agencies like the Bureau adhere to accountability measures similar to those faced by other public entities, which could ultimately strengthen trust in the state's regulatory framework for cannabis.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA SB829

California Institute for Scientific Research: CalRx Initiative: vaccines.

CA AB1235

High-speed rail: legislative oversight.

CA SB460

Joint Sunset Review Committee.

CA AB2249

High-speed rail: legislative oversight.

CA AB805

County of San Diego: transportation agencies.

AZ SB1650

Auditor general; duties; access

MS HB379

Children's Advocacy Commission; create to coordinate and streamline the state's efforts to provide services to children.

MS HB314

Children's Resource Commission; create to coordinate and streamline the state's efforts to provide services to children.