The impact of AB 583 is primarily procedural, as it does not introduce new regulations or alter the qualifications or responsibilities of architects in California. The amendment intends to streamline the language within the code and signifies the legislature's ongoing commitment to maintaining an effective regulatory environment for the architectural profession. Furthermore, the continued existence of the California Architects Board under the amended section emphasizes the state's role in overseeing the architecture profession and protecting public interests.
Summary
Assembly Bill 583, introduced by Assembly Member Diep, seeks to amend Section 5510 of the Business and Professions Code, which relates to the regulation and licensure of architects by the California Architects Board. The bill proposes a nonsubstantive change to ensure clarity and consistency in the existing law regarding the composition and function of the board, which consists of 10 members. This change is characterized as administrative rather than transformative, aiming to simplify the statutory language without altering the regulatory framework governing architects.
Contention
While there appears to be minimal contention surrounding AB 583 due to its nonsubstantive nature, discussions may arise surrounding the broader regulatory landscape of professions and the efficacy of the existing oversight mechanisms in California. Some stakeholders may express concern about the necessity of the amendment versus the resources required to enact legislative changes, even when they are largely administrative in scope.
Board for Professional Engineers, Land Surveyors, and Geologists: licensees: professional land surveyors: surveying practices: monuments and corner accessories.