California 2019-2020 Regular Session

California Assembly Bill AB704

Introduced
2/19/19  
Introduced
2/19/19  
Refer
2/28/19  
Refer
2/28/19  
Report Pass
3/27/19  
Refer
4/1/19  
Refer
4/1/19  
Refer
4/24/19  
Refer
4/24/19  
Failed
2/3/20  

Caption

Alcoholism or drug abuse recovery or treatment facilities.

Impact

The adoption of AB 704 would result in significant changes to the operational procedures of alcoholism and drug abuse recovery facilities in California. By enforcing a criminal record review, the bill seeks to safeguard residents by ensuring that those who provide care have been vetted for prior criminal activities that could pose a risk. The bill allows the State Department of Health Care Services to approve or deny individuals' participation in service provision based on their criminal history, without automatically disqualifying those with drug-related convictions, except in extraordinary circumstances.

Summary

Assembly Bill 704, introduced by Assembly Member Patterson, focuses on the regulation and oversight of alcoholism and drug abuse recovery facilities. The bill mandates that individuals who are hired to work closely with residents at these facilities must undergo a criminal record review prior to their employment. This requirement aims to ensure that staff members meet certain standards regarding their backgrounds, particularly in relation to any past drug-related convictions. Importantly, the bill stipulates that residents of these facilities are exempt from these criminal record requirements, addressing concerns about the potential stigmatization of individuals in recovery.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding AB 704 appears to be generally positive, particularly among advocates for drug recovery and public health safety. Proponents argue that the bill enhances the safety and well-being of vulnerable populations residing in recovery facilities. However, some criticism may stem from concerns about possible overreach regarding the employment of individuals with past struggles with addiction. Supporters believe it balances the need for safety with a compassionate approach towards those recovering from substance abuse issues.

Contention

There could be contentious discussions around the potential stigmatization of individuals with a history of drug convictions. While the bill aims to mitigate hiring biases by not automatically disqualifying candidates solely based on past drug-related offenses, critics may argue that imposing any background checks could deter these individuals from seeking employment in the recovery field. Balancing public safety and the integration of reformed individuals into the workforce is likely to remain a point of contention in debates surrounding the bill.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA AB2200

Alcoholism or drug abuse recovery or treatment facilities.

CA AB2995

Public health: alcohol and drug programs.

CA AB2527

Incarceration: pregnant persons.

LA SCR3

Commends and recognizes the Steve Hoyle Intensive Substance Abuse Program.

CA AB563

School-based health programs.

CA AB1322

School-based health programs.

CA AB732

County jails: prisons: incarcerated pregnant persons.

CA AB255

The Supportive-Recovery Residence Program.