Commends and recognizes the Steve Hoyle Intensive Substance Abuse Program.
The resolution reflects significant positive outcomes of the SHISAP, including substantial fiscal savings for the state. From January 2013 to December 2015, the program reportedly awarded over half a million days of good time credit, resulting in savings of nearly thirteen million dollars. Moreover, offenders participating in the program were able to earn additional credits for treatment, saving an extra million dollars. The overall impact shows that not only does the program assist in reducing costs associated with longer incarceration but also enhances the likelihood of offenders not reoffending, thus benefiting public safety.
SCR3 is a Senate Concurrent Resolution commending the Steve Hoyle Intensive Substance Abuse Program (SHISAP) for its success in addressing substance abuse issues among offenders in Louisiana. The resolution recognizes the program's ability to shorten the sentences of certain offenders by providing therapeutic treatment and support aimed at improving familial relationships. Emphasizing the importance of maintaining strong connections with children during incarceration, SCR3 highlights evidence suggesting that such relationships can facilitate smoother reintegration into society post-release.
The general sentiment around SCR3 appears to be supportive, as it recognizes a successful program that addresses a critical issue in the state—substance abuse among offenders. The accolades received by the program from prestigious institutions, such as the Ash Center at Harvard, further validate its effectiveness. This resolution promotes the importance of rehabilitative efforts over punitive measures, aligning with broader trends in criminal justice reform that favor treatment and reintegration over isolated punishment.
Despite the positive recognition, there may still be discussions about the effectiveness and allocation of resources for substance abuse treatment programs such as SHISAP. While supporters laud the program's achievements, critiques may center around broader systemic issues within Louisiana's penal system, including the availability of such programs statewide and the capacity to address the number of individuals in need of treatment. Emphasis on family connections might also lead to debates regarding the adequacy of family involvement policies in correctional institutions.