California 2019-2020 Regular Session

California Assembly Bill AB760

Introduced
2/19/19  
Refer
3/14/19  
Refer
3/14/19  
Report Pass
3/18/19  
Report Pass
3/18/19  
Refer
3/19/19  
Refer
3/19/19  
Report Pass
1/6/20  
Report Pass
1/6/20  
Refer
1/7/20  
Refer
1/7/20  
Failed
2/3/20  

Caption

Education finance: local control funding formula: pupil transportation: cost-of-living adjustment and add-on.

Impact

The bill's amendments will directly affect how state funding is calculated and distributed to county superintendents of schools, school districts, and charter schools. By incorporating cost-of-living adjustments into the formula, AB 760 addresses growing financial pressures on educational institutions and aims to provide more predictable and equitable funding for transportation services. This is expected to alleviate some financial burden on local educational agencies, particularly for those that rely heavily on pupil transportation for their operations.

Summary

Assembly Bill 760, introduced by Assembly Member Cooper, seeks to amend existing education finance laws pertaining to pupil transportation funding within California. Specifically, it proposes adjustments to the local control funding formula to ensure that funding received for pupil transportation programs is subject to a cost-of-living calculation. This adjustment aims to incrementally equalize transportation funding to 90% of the approved cost expenditures for school districts and charter schools, starting with the 2019-2020 fiscal year.

Sentiment

General sentiment around AB 760 appears to be supportive, especially among educators who feel that updated financial mechanisms are needed to accommodate inflation and previous funding shortfalls. However, there may be some concern regarding the implementation details and whether the equalization efforts will be adequate to meet the actual transportation costs faced by schools, particularly in rural or less affluent areas.

Contention

Notable points of contention include the adequacy of the 90% funding target set forth in the bill, where education stakeholders may debate whether this figure realistically represents the costs incurred by school transportation programs. Potential fiscal implications raised by critics question whether state funding will sufficiently cover the operational expenses that have experienced increases over time due to factors such as inflation. Additionally, there could be concerns regarding the transition to this new calculation model and its impact on the financial unpredictability that some districts currently face.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA AB2685

Education finance: local control funding formula: supplemental grants: lowest performing pupil subgroup or subgroups.

CA AB2774

Education finance: local control funding formula: supplemental grants: lowest performing pupil subgroup or subgroups.

CA AB2635

Education finance: local control funding formula: supplemental grants: lowest performing pupil subgroup or subgroups.

CA AB575

Education finance: local control funding formula: supplemental grants: lowest performing pupil subgroup or subgroups.

CA AB1607

Education finance: local control funding formula.

CA AB1614

Education finance: local control funding formula: base grants: aspirational funding level: reports.

CA AB39

Education finance: local control funding formula: aspirational funding level: reports.

CA AB938

Education finance: classified and certificated staff salaries.