California 2021-2022 Regular Session

California Assembly Bill AB1607

Introduced
1/4/22  
Introduced
1/4/22  
Refer
1/14/22  
Report Pass
4/18/22  
Report Pass
4/18/22  
Refer
4/19/22  

Caption

Education finance: local control funding formula.

Impact

The immediate implication of AB 1607 is that it will provide local educational agencies with a more stable funding calculation methodology, helping mitigate the financial disruptions caused by the pandemic. By using the greater of a three-year average ADA or the current year's ADA, schools can expect to receive funding that more fairly reflects their operational needs. This change seeks to support schools by encouraging sustained funding levels, particularly for those that have seen decreased attendance during the pandemic.

Summary

Assembly Bill 1607 aims to amend sections of the California Education Code related to education finance, specifically addressing the local control funding formula. This bill modifies how average daily attendance (ADA) is calculated for funding purposes, transitioning to a three-year average beginning in the 2022-2023 school year. In light of the challenges brought on by the COVID-19 pandemic, the bill seeks to ensure that local educational agencies can secure more consistent funding despite fluctuations in student attendance in the current year.

Sentiment

The general sentiment around AB 1607 is largely positive among education advocates and stakeholders who recognize the importance of consistent funding for schools facing economic uncertainty. Proponents celebrate the bill as a necessary adaptation to protect educational funding in a time of crisis, while acknowledging the challenges local agencies face with variable school attendance rates due to ongoing public health concerns.

Contention

However, there are points of contention regarding the implementation of this bill. Critics raise concerns about its long-term efficacy and whether it will adequately address funding inequalities among different school districts, specifically between those that are more affluent compared to underfunded districts. The debate highlights concerns over equitable distribution of state funds and whether the changes will genuinely benefit all students, particularly those in marginalized communities.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA AB2774

Education finance: local control funding formula: supplemental grants: lowest performing pupil subgroup or subgroups.

CA AB2685

Education finance: local control funding formula: supplemental grants: lowest performing pupil subgroup or subgroups.

CA AB2635

Education finance: local control funding formula: supplemental grants: lowest performing pupil subgroup or subgroups.

CA AB575

Education finance: local control funding formula: supplemental grants: lowest performing pupil subgroup or subgroups.

CA AB760

Education finance: local control funding formula: pupil transportation: cost-of-living adjustment and add-on.

CA AB938

Education finance: classified and certificated staff salaries.

CA AB39

Education finance: local control funding formula: aspirational funding level: reports.

CA AB1225

Education finance: local control funding formula: youths experiencing homelessness.