California 2019-2020 Regular Session

California Assembly Bill AB814

Introduced
2/20/19  
Introduced
2/20/19  
Refer
3/4/19  
Report Pass
3/27/19  
Report Pass
3/27/19  
Refer
3/27/19  
Refer
3/27/19  
Report Pass
4/2/19  
Refer
4/3/19  
Refer
4/3/19  
Report Pass
4/24/19  
Report Pass
4/24/19  
Engrossed
5/2/19  
Refer
5/2/19  
Refer
5/2/19  
Refer
5/16/19  
Refer
5/16/19  
Report Pass
6/4/19  
Enrolled
6/18/19  
Enrolled
6/18/19  
Chaptered
6/26/19  
Chaptered
6/26/19  

Caption

Vehicles: unlawful access to computer systems.

Impact

The enactment of AB 814 is expected to strengthen legal protections against computer crimes related to vehicles, thereby aiming to prevent incidents of tampering and unauthorized data access. This adjustment offers clearer guidelines for law enforcement and potential legal ramifications for offenders, who could face penalties for accessing vehicle systems without permission. The measure reflects a recognition of the increasing intersection between automotive technology and cybersecurity issues, demonstrating the need for legislation that evolves alongside technological advancements in the transportation sector.

Summary

Assembly Bill 814, introduced by Assemblymember Chau, amends Section 502 of the Penal Code by clarifying the scope of what constitutes unlawful access to computer systems. The bill specifically includes devices and systems that are integrated with or connected to motor vehicles under the definition of a computer system. This amendment aims to address concerns about unauthorized access to the technological systems that govern vehicles, enhancing protection against vehicle tampering and illegal data access. With the growing reliance on technology in automobiles, the legislation aims to safeguard the integrity of vehicle software and databases, which are critical to the functionality and security of modern vehicles.

Sentiment

The overall sentiment surrounding AB 814 has been largely positive, especially among tech and automotive safety advocates who see the bill as necessary for adapting legal frameworks to contemporary realities. Supporters argue that clearer legal definitions are critical to deterring potential offenses that could compromise vehicle safety and consumer data privacy. However, as with many legislative measures involving technology, there are nuances of concern regarding the enforcement of such laws and the implications they may have on vehicle ownership rights and data privacy for consumers.

Contention

While the bill has been supported by many groups concerned with computer security and automotive integrity, potential areas of contention center around how these laws will be enforced and the implications for automotive privacy. Critics have raised concerns about overreach in defining access to personal and proprietary data within vehicles. Additionally, questions regarding how these laws might affect repair and maintenance practices for vehicles could lead to debates about consumer rights versus the deterring of malicious activity.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA SB500

Extortion.

CA AB1263

Firearms: ghost guns.

CA SB260

Unmanned aircraft.

CA AB3140

Access to reproductive health services.

CA AB1356

Reproductive health care services.

CA AB2791

Crimes: stalking, false emergency reports, and harassment.

CA AB1899

Crimes: false personation.

CA AB1598

Impersonation for the purpose of a sexual relationship.