California 2019-2020 Regular Session

California Assembly Bill AB892

Introduced
2/20/19  
Introduced
2/20/19  
Refer
3/21/19  
Refer
3/21/19  
Report Pass
3/21/19  
Report Pass
3/21/19  
Refer
3/25/19  
Refer
3/25/19  
Report Pass
4/22/19  
Report Pass
4/22/19  
Refer
4/23/19  
Refer
4/23/19  
Report Pass
4/25/19  
Report Pass
4/25/19  
Refer
4/30/19  
Report Pass
5/8/19  
Report Pass
5/8/19  
Engrossed
5/16/19  
Engrossed
5/16/19  
Refer
5/16/19  
Refer
5/16/19  
Refer
5/29/19  
Report Pass
6/27/19  
Report Pass
6/27/19  
Refer
7/1/19  
Refer
7/1/19  
Enrolled
9/5/19  
Enrolled
9/5/19  
Chaptered
9/20/19  
Chaptered
9/20/19  
Passed
9/20/19  

Caption

Transfers of real property.

Impact

The amendments proposed in AB 892 are intended to ensure that all parties involved in real estate transactions are informed of their rights and obligations. By refining the definitions and required disclosures, the bill aims to promote transparency in property sales and leases, which could lead to a more informed buying process for potential homeowners. The change places a stronger emphasis on the responsibilities of real estate professionals, enhancing consumer protection and potentially impacting the ease of transactions involving residential properties.

Summary

Assembly Bill 892, introduced by Assemblymember Holden, aims to amend several sections of the Civil Code related to real property transactions in California. The bill seeks to clarify and enhance the existing framework governing the duties of real estate brokers and salespersons regarding property disclosures, particularly for single-family residential properties. It mandates that brokers must retain documentation related to transactions for a minimum of three years and introduces new forms for property transfer disclosures that include an indication of whether any substituted disclosures exist.

Sentiment

The sentiment around AB 892 appears to be largely supportive among industry stakeholders, as it modernizes and clarifies existing laws which can be seen as beneficial for both real estate professionals and consumers. However, there may be some concerns regarding the additional burdens placed on brokers, particularly in terms of retaining documents and adhering to new disclosure protocols. Overall, the discussions surrounding the bill have highlighted a consensus on the need for improved transparency and accountability in real estate transactions.

Contention

While the bill is primarily viewed as a positive step towards better regulation of real estate transactions, some debate exists concerning the practicality of the new requirements. Critics might argue that the increased documentation demands on brokers could lead to higher operational costs, which may be passed on to consumers. Additionally, the precise impact of these disclosure amendments on the speed and efficiency of property transactions remains a point of contention, particularly in a competitive housing market.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA AB1289

Real property disclosure requirements.

IN HB1060

Environmental scrutiny before property transfer.

IN HB1218

Environmental scrutiny before property transfer.

IL HB2217

TENANT RADON PROTECTION ACT

CA AB2992

Real Estate Law: buyer-broker representation agreements.

IN HB1025

Septic system inspection and well water testing.

CT HB07078

An Act Concerning The Removal Of Unauthorized Persons From Real Property, Continuing Education Requirements For Real Estate Licensees, Requiring A Study Of Residential Real Property Wholesaling And Revising The Title Of A Real Estate Salesperson To A Real Estate Agent.