California 2019-2020 Regular Session

California Assembly Bill AB973

Introduced
2/21/19  
Introduced
2/21/19  
Refer
3/4/19  
Refer
3/4/19  
Report Pass
3/26/19  
Report Pass
3/26/19  
Refer
3/26/19  
Refer
3/26/19  
Report Pass
4/10/19  
Report Pass
4/10/19  
Engrossed
4/25/19  
Engrossed
4/25/19  
Refer
4/25/19  
Refer
5/8/19  
Refer
5/8/19  
Report Pass
5/13/19  
Refer
5/13/19  
Refer
5/13/19  
Report Pass
6/3/19  
Report Pass
6/3/19  
Refer
6/3/19  
Enrolled
8/12/19  
Enrolled
8/12/19  
Chaptered
8/30/19  
Passed
8/30/19  

Caption

Pharmacies: compounding.

Impact

The implementation of AB973 imposes stricter compliance requirements on pharmacies, as failure to adhere to the new compounding standards could result in criminal charges. This represents a shift in regulatory oversight by the California State Board of Pharmacy. While the bill promotes uniformity in compounding standards, there are implications for local pharmacies regarding potential increases in operational costs associated with meeting the new regulatory demands. Moreover, it establishes a state-mandated local program, though it also specifies that no reimbursement for additional costs incurred by local entities is necessary.

Summary

Assembly Bill No. 973, known as AB973, amends the Business and Professions Code to establish new regulations concerning the compounding of drug preparations by pharmacies in California. The bill mandates that all compounding practices comply with the standards set forth in the current version of the United States Pharmacopeia-National Formulary, ensuring rigorous testing and quality assurance. This change aims to enhance drug safety and efficacy in the state, directly impacting how pharmacies operate when preparing sterile drug products.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding AB973 appears to be supportive among patient safety advocates and regulatory officials who emphasize the importance of high-quality pharmaceutical standards. Stakeholders argue that enhanced regulations will help safeguard the public from poorly compounded medications. However, there is concern among pharmacy owners and practitioners who fear that these new requirements may impose significant financial and operational burdens on their practices, leading to a divide in opinion about the practicality of the legislation.

Contention

A notable point of contention revolves around the bill's requirement for compliance with a national standard without provision for financial support or assistance to local pharmacies that may struggle with the implications of these changes. Critics argue that while the intent is aligned with improving healthcare outcomes, the lack of state reimbursement for local agencies could limit the capacity of smaller pharmacies to deliver on these enhanced standards, creating disparities in pharmaceutical care across different regions.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA AB3063

Pharmacies: compounding.

CA AB782

Pharmacies: compounding.

CT HB05262

An Act Concerning The Pharmacy Practice Act And Counterfeit Drugs Or Devices.

MS SB2675

Pharmacists; authorize to test for and administer treatment for minor, nonchronic health conditions.

MS HB252

Pharmacists; authorize to test for and administer treatment for minor, nonchronic health conditions.

FL H1407

Compounding Pharmacies

AZ HB2490

Pharmacists; providers; collaborative practice agreements

AZ SB1234

Pharmacy board; virtual manufacturers