California Assembly Bill AB975

California 2019-2020 Regular Session

• Introduced: 2/21/19
• Refer: 3/4/19
• Report Pass: 4/1/19
• Refer: 4/2/19
• Report Pass: 4/9/19
• Refer: 4/9/19
• Report Pass: 4/24/19
• Engrossed: 5/6/19
• Refer: 5/6/19
• Refer: 5/16/19
• Report Pass: 6/25/19
• Refer: 6/26/19
• Report Pass: 7/3/19
• Refer: 7/3/19
• Refer: 8/12/19

Caption

Environmental protection: California Coastal Resilience and Adaptation Leadership and Coordination Act of 2019.

Impact

This bill establishes a framework for the Secretary of the Natural Resources Agency to facilitate communication and collaboration concerning climate adaptation strategies. It mandates the use of quantified risk assessments to prioritize actions and establish best practices for managing coastal resilience. By integrating state, regional, and international efforts, AB975 seeks to enhance the effectiveness and efficiency of adaptation measures, potentially leading to better environmental outcomes and improved protection for affected communities and ecosystems. The requirement for annual reporting ensures accountability and continual assessment of progress in these adaptation efforts.

Summary

Assembly Bill 975, known as the California Coastal Resilience and Adaptation Leadership and Coordination Act of 2019, aims to enhance the state's efforts in addressing the impacts of climate change on coastal and marine environments. The bill requires the Secretary of the Natural Resources Agency to coordinate with various governmental entities and international bodies to promote adaptation strategies relevant to ocean and coastal resilience. This legislation is a step towards improving the state's response to climate vulnerabilities, mobilizing resources, and leveraging partnerships at multiple governance levels to safeguard California's natural resources.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding AB975 appears to be supportive among environmental advocates and state officials who recognize the need for cohesive and proactive measures to confront climate change. However, it may face scrutiny from individuals or groups concerned about the implications of increased state oversight on local governance and economic activities. The balance between effective environmental protections and local autonomy will likely continue to be a theme in discussions related to this bill.

Contention

Notably, some points of contention involve whether the state's efforts could be perceived as overreach into areas traditionally managed at local levels. Critics may argue that while collective action is essential for addressing climate change, it needs to respect local knowledge and decision-making. The delicate interplay between state mandates and local control presents ongoing challenges, as there is a need for meaningful engagement with local communities to ensure that the proposed measures align with their unique contexts and priorities.