California 2019-2020 Regular Session

California Assembly Bill ACR105

Introduced
6/17/19  
Introduced
6/17/19  
Refer
6/20/19  
Refer
6/20/19  
Refer
7/3/19  
Engrossed
8/19/19  
Engrossed
8/19/19  
Refer
8/20/19  
Refer
8/20/19  
Refer
8/28/19  

Caption

Prescription drug prices.

Impact

The increasing expenditure on prescription drugs in California has created significant financial strain on both individuals and the state's budget. The resolution highlights alarming trends, such as a consistent rise of approximately 20% per year in drug prices since 2012, leading to major implications not only for enrolled state program participants but also for the general population, including businesses. ACR 105 positions the state to explore partnerships with Washington and Oregon, which have initiated similar efforts to combat high prescription costs. By fostering cooperative strategies, the resolution aims to enhance drug cost transparency and collaborative negotiation efforts.

Summary

ACR 105, introduced by Assembly Member Chiu, is a legislative resolution aimed at addressing the escalating costs of prescription drugs in California. The bill underscores the commitment of the California Legislature to lower these costs for all citizens and advocates for an expansion of the state's single-purchaser system for prescription drugs. This system is designed to facilitate collective bargaining between consumers and pharmaceutical companies, which is particularly critical given the monopoly power often wielded by the industry. The resolution emphasizes the need for state-level involvement to enhance negotiation power and improve healthcare accessibility.

Contention

While ACR 105 garners substantial support for its approach to curtailing prescription drug costs, potential points of contention may arise concerning the efficiency and equity of a collective bargaining model. Critics may argue that a single-purchaser system could unintentionally disincentivize pharmaceutical innovation or create inefficiencies through bureaucratic processes. Furthermore, discussions surrounding the extent of government intervention in healthcare markets often provoke debate regarding the role of state versus private entities in determining pricing structures within the pharmaceutical industry.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA AB2203

Insulin cost-sharing cap.

CA SB476

Discount Prescription Drug Program.

CA AB97

Health care coverage: insulin affordability.

CA AB1943

Insulin affordability.

CA SB473

Health care coverage: insulin cost sharing.

CA SB90

Health care coverage: insulin affordability.

CA SB40

Health care coverage: insulin.

CA AB1419

Insulin.