California 2019-2020 Regular Session

California Assembly Bill ACR64 Compare Versions

OldNewDifferences
1-Assembly Concurrent Resolution No. 64 CHAPTER 148Relative to postsecondary education. [ Filed with Secretary of State September 11, 2019. ] LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL'S DIGESTACR 64, McCarty. California State University and University of California: SAT and ACT.This measure would request the Trustees of the California State University and the Regents of the University of California to conduct a study on the usefulness, effectiveness, and need for the SAT and ACT to determine student admissions, and would provide that the study should include evaluation of specified admissions eligibility and qualifications measures and testing issues. The measure would also provide that the study should include recommendations and, if determined necessary, a plan for phasing out the use of the SAT and ACT as a basis for admission.Digest Key Fiscal Committee: YES Bill TextWHEREAS, The SAT tests reward costly test preparation rather than hard work and merit; andWHEREAS, Wealthier students tend to do, on average, 400 points better than low-income students on the SAT; andWHEREAS, Male students tend to receive much higher SAT math scores than female students, and slightly higher SAT writing scores than female students; andWHEREAS, Students who generally do well in classes may test poorly in stressful conditions, such as testing to determine college entry; andWHEREAS, The SAT emphasizes speed, quick recall, and time management over subject matter knowledge; andWHEREAS, On average, White and Asian students do better than Black and Hispanic students; now, therefore, be itResolved by the Assembly of the State of California, the Senate thereof concurring, That the Trustees of the California State University and the Regents of the University of California are requested to conduct a study on the usefulness, effectiveness, and need for the SAT and ACT to determine student admissions; and be it furtherResolved, That the study should include, but not be limited to, evaluation of norm-referenced versus criterion-referenced tests, test outcomes gaps based on ethnicity or income, test anxiety, test bias, and use of other multiple measures to determine student eligibility and qualifications such as Advanced Placement test results, International Baccalaureate (IB) test results, IB Diploma Programme completion, extracurricular activities, personal essays, teacher recommendations, submissions of creative works, and cumulative grade point average; and be it furtherResolved, That the study should additionally include recommendations and, if determined necessary, a plan for phasing out the use of the SAT and ACT as a basis for admission; and be it furtherResolved, That the Chief Clerk of the Assembly transmit copies of this resolution to the Trustees of the California State University, to the Regents of the University of California, and to the author for appropriate distribution.
1+Enrolled September 09, 2019 Passed IN Senate September 05, 2019 Passed IN Assembly June 06, 2019 Amended IN Assembly April 25, 2019 CALIFORNIA LEGISLATURE 20192020 REGULAR SESSION Assembly Concurrent Resolution No. 64Introduced by Assembly Member McCarty(Coauthors: Assembly Members Aguiar-Curry, Arambula, Bauer-Kahan, Berman, Bloom, Boerner Horvath, Bonta, Brough, Burke, Calderon, Carrillo, Cervantes, Chau, Chiu, Chu, Cooper, Daly, Diep, Eggman, Flora, Frazier, Friedman, Gabriel, Eduardo Garcia, Gipson, Gloria, Gonzalez, Gray, Grayson, Holden, Irwin, Jones-Sawyer, Kalra, Levine, Limn, Low, Maienschein, Medina, Mullin, Muratsuchi, Petrie-Norris, Quirk-Silva, Ramos, Rendon, Reyes, Luz Rivas, Robert Rivas, Rodriguez, Blanca Rubio, Salas, Santiago, Smith, Mark Stone, Waldron, Weber, Wicks, and Wood)April 02, 2019Relative to postsecondary education. LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL'S DIGESTACR 64, McCarty. California State University and University of California: SAT and ACT.This measure would request the Trustees of the California State University and the Regents of the University of California to conduct a study on the usefulness, effectiveness, and need for the SAT and ACT to determine student admissions, and would provide that the study should include evaluation of specified admissions eligibility and qualifications measures and testing issues. The measure would also provide that the study should include recommendations and, if determined necessary, a plan for phasing out the use of the SAT and ACT as a basis for admission.Digest Key Fiscal Committee: YES Bill TextWHEREAS, The SAT tests reward costly test preparation rather than hard work and merit; andWHEREAS, Wealthier students tend to do, on average, 400 points better than low-income students on the SAT; andWHEREAS, Male students tend to receive much higher SAT math scores than female students, and slightly higher SAT writing scores than female students; andWHEREAS, Students who generally do well in classes may test poorly in stressful conditions, such as testing to determine college entry; andWHEREAS, The SAT emphasizes speed, quick recall, and time management over subject matter knowledge; andWHEREAS, On average, White and Asian students do better than Black and Hispanic students; now, therefore, be itResolved by the Assembly of the State of California, the Senate thereof concurring, That the Trustees of the California State University and the Regents of the University of California are requested to conduct a study on the usefulness, effectiveness, and need for the SAT and ACT to determine student admissions; and be it furtherResolved, That the study should include, but not be limited to, evaluation of norm-referenced versus criterion-referenced tests, test outcomes gaps based on ethnicity or income, test anxiety, test bias, and use of other multiple measures to determine student eligibility and qualifications such as Advanced Placement test results, International Baccalaureate (IB) test results, IB Diploma Programme completion, extracurricular activities, personal essays, teacher recommendations, submissions of creative works, and cumulative grade point average; and be it furtherResolved, That the study should additionally include recommendations and, if determined necessary, a plan for phasing out the use of the SAT and ACT as a basis for admission; and be it furtherResolved, That the Chief Clerk of the Assembly transmit copies of this resolution to the Trustees of the California State University, to the Regents of the University of California, and to the author for appropriate distribution.
22
3- Assembly Concurrent Resolution No. 64 CHAPTER 148Relative to postsecondary education. [ Filed with Secretary of State September 11, 2019. ] LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL'S DIGESTACR 64, McCarty. California State University and University of California: SAT and ACT.This measure would request the Trustees of the California State University and the Regents of the University of California to conduct a study on the usefulness, effectiveness, and need for the SAT and ACT to determine student admissions, and would provide that the study should include evaluation of specified admissions eligibility and qualifications measures and testing issues. The measure would also provide that the study should include recommendations and, if determined necessary, a plan for phasing out the use of the SAT and ACT as a basis for admission.Digest Key Fiscal Committee: YES
3+ Enrolled September 09, 2019 Passed IN Senate September 05, 2019 Passed IN Assembly June 06, 2019 Amended IN Assembly April 25, 2019 CALIFORNIA LEGISLATURE 20192020 REGULAR SESSION Assembly Concurrent Resolution No. 64Introduced by Assembly Member McCarty(Coauthors: Assembly Members Aguiar-Curry, Arambula, Bauer-Kahan, Berman, Bloom, Boerner Horvath, Bonta, Brough, Burke, Calderon, Carrillo, Cervantes, Chau, Chiu, Chu, Cooper, Daly, Diep, Eggman, Flora, Frazier, Friedman, Gabriel, Eduardo Garcia, Gipson, Gloria, Gonzalez, Gray, Grayson, Holden, Irwin, Jones-Sawyer, Kalra, Levine, Limn, Low, Maienschein, Medina, Mullin, Muratsuchi, Petrie-Norris, Quirk-Silva, Ramos, Rendon, Reyes, Luz Rivas, Robert Rivas, Rodriguez, Blanca Rubio, Salas, Santiago, Smith, Mark Stone, Waldron, Weber, Wicks, and Wood)April 02, 2019Relative to postsecondary education. LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL'S DIGESTACR 64, McCarty. California State University and University of California: SAT and ACT.This measure would request the Trustees of the California State University and the Regents of the University of California to conduct a study on the usefulness, effectiveness, and need for the SAT and ACT to determine student admissions, and would provide that the study should include evaluation of specified admissions eligibility and qualifications measures and testing issues. The measure would also provide that the study should include recommendations and, if determined necessary, a plan for phasing out the use of the SAT and ACT as a basis for admission.Digest Key Fiscal Committee: YES
44
5- Assembly Concurrent Resolution No. 64 CHAPTER 148
5+ Enrolled September 09, 2019 Passed IN Senate September 05, 2019 Passed IN Assembly June 06, 2019 Amended IN Assembly April 25, 2019
66
7- Assembly Concurrent Resolution No. 64
7+Enrolled September 09, 2019
8+Passed IN Senate September 05, 2019
9+Passed IN Assembly June 06, 2019
10+Amended IN Assembly April 25, 2019
811
9- CHAPTER 148
12+ CALIFORNIA LEGISLATURE 20192020 REGULAR SESSION
13+
14+ Assembly Concurrent Resolution
15+
16+No. 64
17+
18+Introduced by Assembly Member McCarty(Coauthors: Assembly Members Aguiar-Curry, Arambula, Bauer-Kahan, Berman, Bloom, Boerner Horvath, Bonta, Brough, Burke, Calderon, Carrillo, Cervantes, Chau, Chiu, Chu, Cooper, Daly, Diep, Eggman, Flora, Frazier, Friedman, Gabriel, Eduardo Garcia, Gipson, Gloria, Gonzalez, Gray, Grayson, Holden, Irwin, Jones-Sawyer, Kalra, Levine, Limn, Low, Maienschein, Medina, Mullin, Muratsuchi, Petrie-Norris, Quirk-Silva, Ramos, Rendon, Reyes, Luz Rivas, Robert Rivas, Rodriguez, Blanca Rubio, Salas, Santiago, Smith, Mark Stone, Waldron, Weber, Wicks, and Wood)April 02, 2019
19+
20+Introduced by Assembly Member McCarty(Coauthors: Assembly Members Aguiar-Curry, Arambula, Bauer-Kahan, Berman, Bloom, Boerner Horvath, Bonta, Brough, Burke, Calderon, Carrillo, Cervantes, Chau, Chiu, Chu, Cooper, Daly, Diep, Eggman, Flora, Frazier, Friedman, Gabriel, Eduardo Garcia, Gipson, Gloria, Gonzalez, Gray, Grayson, Holden, Irwin, Jones-Sawyer, Kalra, Levine, Limn, Low, Maienschein, Medina, Mullin, Muratsuchi, Petrie-Norris, Quirk-Silva, Ramos, Rendon, Reyes, Luz Rivas, Robert Rivas, Rodriguez, Blanca Rubio, Salas, Santiago, Smith, Mark Stone, Waldron, Weber, Wicks, and Wood)
21+April 02, 2019
1022
1123 Relative to postsecondary education.
12-
13- [ Filed with Secretary of State September 11, 2019. ]
1424
1525 LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL'S DIGEST
1626
1727 ## LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL'S DIGEST
1828
1929 ACR 64, McCarty. California State University and University of California: SAT and ACT.
2030
2131 This measure would request the Trustees of the California State University and the Regents of the University of California to conduct a study on the usefulness, effectiveness, and need for the SAT and ACT to determine student admissions, and would provide that the study should include evaluation of specified admissions eligibility and qualifications measures and testing issues. The measure would also provide that the study should include recommendations and, if determined necessary, a plan for phasing out the use of the SAT and ACT as a basis for admission.
2232
2333 This measure would request the Trustees of the California State University and the Regents of the University of California to conduct a study on the usefulness, effectiveness, and need for the SAT and ACT to determine student admissions, and would provide that the study should include evaluation of specified admissions eligibility and qualifications measures and testing issues. The measure would also provide that the study should include recommendations and, if determined necessary, a plan for phasing out the use of the SAT and ACT as a basis for admission.
2434
2535 ## Digest Key
2636
2737 ## Bill Text
2838
2939 WHEREAS, The SAT tests reward costly test preparation rather than hard work and merit; and
3040
3141 WHEREAS, Wealthier students tend to do, on average, 400 points better than low-income students on the SAT; and
3242
3343 WHEREAS, Male students tend to receive much higher SAT math scores than female students, and slightly higher SAT writing scores than female students; and
3444
3545 WHEREAS, Students who generally do well in classes may test poorly in stressful conditions, such as testing to determine college entry; and
3646
3747 WHEREAS, The SAT emphasizes speed, quick recall, and time management over subject matter knowledge; and
3848
3949 WHEREAS, On average, White and Asian students do better than Black and Hispanic students; now, therefore, be it
4050
4151 Resolved by the Assembly of the State of California, the Senate thereof concurring, That the Trustees of the California State University and the Regents of the University of California are requested to conduct a study on the usefulness, effectiveness, and need for the SAT and ACT to determine student admissions; and be it further
4252
4353 Resolved, That the study should include, but not be limited to, evaluation of norm-referenced versus criterion-referenced tests, test outcomes gaps based on ethnicity or income, test anxiety, test bias, and use of other multiple measures to determine student eligibility and qualifications such as Advanced Placement test results, International Baccalaureate (IB) test results, IB Diploma Programme completion, extracurricular activities, personal essays, teacher recommendations, submissions of creative works, and cumulative grade point average; and be it further
4454
4555 Resolved, That the study should additionally include recommendations and, if determined necessary, a plan for phasing out the use of the SAT and ACT as a basis for admission; and be it further
4656
4757 Resolved, That the Chief Clerk of the Assembly transmit copies of this resolution to the Trustees of the California State University, to the Regents of the University of California, and to the author for appropriate distribution.