California 2019-2020 Regular Session

California Assembly Bill AJR10

Introduced
2/26/19  
Introduced
2/26/19  
Refer
4/22/19  
Refer
4/22/19  
Report Pass
6/17/19  
Refer
6/18/19  
Refer
6/18/19  
Engrossed
7/8/19  
Engrossed
7/8/19  
Refer
7/9/19  
Refer
7/9/19  
Refer
8/14/19  
Refer
8/14/19  
Enrolled
9/9/19  
Enrolled
9/9/19  
Chaptered
9/26/19  
Chaptered
9/26/19  
Passed
9/26/19  

Caption

Federal Clean Air Act.

Impact

If passed, AJR 10 aims to solidify California's position as a leader in combatting air pollution while advocating for the protection of public health and the environment. The resolution reflects the legislature's determination to maintain robust vehicle emissions standards that have been shown to significantly reduce air pollution throughout the state. This commitment supports initiatives that create technological innovations in the automobile industry and could have positive economic repercussions by maintaining jobs related to the manufacturing of cleaner vehicles.

Summary

AJR 10, introduced by Assemblymember Reyes, is an Assembly Joint Resolution that emphasizes California's commitment to maintaining stringent fuel economy and greenhouse gas emissions standards. It expresses strong support for California's authority to implement stricter air pollution regulations under its federal Clean Air Act waiver. The resolution highlights California's historical precedent in regulating vehicle emissions and urges federal leaders to reject the proposed Safer Affordable Fuel-Efficient Vehicles Rule for model years 2021 to 2026, which seeks to weaken existing standards.

Sentiment

The general sentiment surrounding AJR 10 appears to be overwhelmingly positive among environmental advocacy groups and supporters of strong emissions standards. Proponents argue that maintaining high emissions standards is crucial for addressing California's severe air quality issues and public health crises, which include high rates of asthma and other pollution-related illnesses. However, sentiment among auto manufacturers and some industry stakeholders may be more mixed, as they could view the resolution as a regulatory burden potentially affecting vehicle designs and costs.

Contention

Notable points of contention include the implications of the SAFE Vehicles Proposed Rule, which is perceived as posing a threat to California’s autonomy in setting its own emissions standards. Opponents of the federal rule argue that it undermines decades of environmental progress and could exacerbate public health issues due to increased emissions. The measure also raises the concern that loosening emissions restrictions will economically benefit the oil industry more than public health or environmental initiatives.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA AJR50

Federal Clean Air Act.

CA AJR29

Oil and gas: offshore drilling: operations: leases.

CA AJR49

Federal Clean Air Act.

CA SR51

Relative to a New Five-year National Offshore Oil and Gas Leasing Program on the Outer Continental Shelf

CA SR35

Relative to new Outer Continental Shelf oil and gas leasing in federal waters offshore California

CA SR73

Relative to a new 5-year National Offshore Oil and Gas Leasing Program on the Outer Continental Shelf

CA SJR5

Enteric methane reduction solutions: cattle industries.

CA SJR2

Climate change: Fossil Fuel Non-Proliferation Treaty.