California 2019-2020 Regular Session

California Senate Bill SB223

Introduced
2/7/19  
Refer
2/21/19  
Refer
2/21/19  
Refer
3/11/19  
Report Pass
3/20/19  
Report Pass
3/20/19  
Refer
3/20/19  
Refer
3/20/19  
Report Pass
3/26/19  
Report Pass
3/26/19  
Engrossed
3/28/19  
Engrossed
3/28/19  
Refer
5/6/19  
Refer
5/6/19  
Report Pass
6/20/19  
Report Pass
6/20/19  
Refer
6/20/19  
Refer
6/20/19  
Report Pass
6/25/19  
Report Pass
6/25/19  
Enrolled
8/30/19  
Chaptered
10/9/19  
Chaptered
10/9/19  
Passed
10/9/19  

Caption

Pupil health: administration of medicinal cannabis: schoolsites.

Impact

In its implementation, JoJo's Act would adopt a more inclusive stance on pupil healthcare, thus potentially impacting state legislation surrounding student health rights. School districts will have the authority to craft policies that align with the stipulations of the bill, allowing for medicinal cannabis to be administered during school hours. However, there are regulatory safeguards in place to ensure that this does not disrupt the educational environment or expose other students to medicinal cannabis. The confidentiality of pupil records related to the administration of cannabis will also be enforced under state and federal laws governing such records.

Summary

Senate Bill No. 223, known as JoJo's Act, aims to authorize parents or guardians of qualified patients to possess and administer medicinal cannabis to their children on school premises. This bill builds on existing laws concerning the administration of medication in schools by extending the right to include medicinal cannabis, which has seen growing acceptance under legislative frameworks like the Compassionate Use Act in California. With the provision for such policy adoption, the bill envisions enabling schools to create an environment where students can receive necessary medical support without the barriers that currently exist.

Sentiment

While the bill has garnered support from those advocating for the rights of families seeking alternative medical treatments for their children, it has not been without contention. Critics might express concerns about the potential normalization of cannabis in educational spaces and its implications for student welfare. Conversely, advocates argue that the need for medical care during school hours, particularly for those with chronic conditions, outweighs these concerns. Thus, the sentiment surrounding the bill varies, reflecting broader societal attitudes towards cannabis use and its place within school health policies.

Contention

Notable points of contention include the conditions under which parents may administer medicinal cannabis, ensuring that it does not disrupt the educational setting and the legal ramifications if schools devise policies that inadvertently conflict with state or federal laws. The provision allows for policies to be amended or rescinded if necessary, such as if a school district is at risk of losing federal funding due to its policy on medicinal cannabis, raising complex questions about the balance of healthcare access and regulatory compliance within educational institutions.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA SB1127

An act to add Section 49414.1 to the Education Code, relating to pupil health.

CA SB428

Pupil health: school employee training: youth mental and behavioral health.

CA AB830

High school exit examination: repeal.

CA AB2998

Opioid overdose reversal medications: pupil administration.

CA AB49

Schoolsites: immigration enforcement.

CA SB959

Educational equity: immigration and citizenship status.

CA AB746

Public health: potable water systems: lead testing: schoolsites.

CA SB98

Elementary, secondary, and postsecondary education: immigration enforcement: notification.