California 2017-2018 Regular Session

California Senate Bill SB1127

Introduced
2/13/18  
Introduced
2/13/18  
Refer
2/22/18  
Refer
2/22/18  
Report Pass
4/10/18  
Report Pass
4/10/18  
Refer
4/11/18  
Refer
4/30/18  
Refer
4/30/18  
Report Pass
5/14/18  
Report Pass
5/14/18  
Engrossed
5/21/18  
Engrossed
5/21/18  
Refer
6/7/18  
Refer
6/7/18  
Report Pass
6/14/18  
Report Pass
6/14/18  
Refer
6/14/18  
Refer
6/14/18  
Report Pass
7/3/18  
Enrolled
8/28/18  
Enrolled
8/28/18  
Vetoed
9/28/18  

Caption

An act to add Section 49414.1 to the Education Code, relating to pupil health.

Impact

The introduction of SB 1127 represents a significant shift in how educational institutions can address the health needs of students using medicinal cannabis. By legally permitting parents to administer medicinal cannabis at school, this bill seeks to integrate a broader understanding of pupil health into school policies, contrasting with traditional restrictions surrounding drug use in educational settings. This may enhance student access to necessary medical treatments, thereby supporting better educational outcomes for affected pupils.

Summary

Senate Bill 1127, known as Jojos Act, seeks to allow the administration of medicinal cannabis to qualified students on school grounds. The legislation permits school districts and charter schools to adopt policies that allow parents or guardians to possess and administer medicinal cannabis (excluding smokeable forms) to pupils who qualify under the Compassionate Use Act of 1996. This bill aims to give children who rely on medicinal cannabis the ability to receive their medication during school hours, ensuring their health and wellbeing while maintaining access to education.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding SB 1127 is mixed. Proponents argue that the bill is a compassionate response to the needs of students who require medicinal cannabis for various health conditions. They believe that the bill acknowledges the realities of modern medicine and offers a practical solution to support affected students. Conversely, there are concerns among opponents regarding potential risks, such as the impact on the school environment and the implications for substance use policy. Critics argue that allowing parental administration of cannabis on school premises may cause disruptions or create unacceptable risks.

Contention

Points of contention primarily revolve around the implications for school safety and the broader context of drug policy. Critics express concern that administering medicinal cannabis in schools might set a precedent that complicates existing frameworks for drug regulation within educational institutions. Furthermore, the potential for confusion regarding the boundaries of permitted cannabis use poses challenges for school governance, especially in maintaining a conducive learning environment.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA SB223

Pupil health: administration of medicinal cannabis: schoolsites.

CA SB959

Educational equity: immigration and citizenship status.

CA AB49

Schoolsites: immigration enforcement.

CA AB2998

Opioid overdose reversal medications: pupil administration.

CA AB419

Educational equity: immigration enforcement.

CA AB746

Public health: potable water systems: lead testing: schoolsites.

CA AB830

High school exit examination: repeal.

CA SB153

Education finance: education omnibus budget trailer bill.