California 2025-2026 Regular Session

California Senate Bill SB568

Introduced
2/20/25  
Refer
3/5/25  
Refer
3/24/25  
Refer
4/2/25  
Report Pass
4/9/25  

Caption

Pupil health: epinephrine delivery systems: public schools and programs.

Impact

The bill significantly impacts the education system by formalizing the responsibility of school districts, county offices of education, and charter schools to manage emergency medical care protocols regarding anaphylaxis. It mandates that public schools be equipped with epinephrine delivery systems and establishes guidelines for obtaining prescriptions from authorized medical personnel, thus improving preparedness for allergic emergencies. Additionally, if the bill incurs costs for local agencies, the state is required to reimburse them in accordance with the Government Code, ensuring that schools are financially supported in upholding this duty.

Summary

Senate Bill 568, introduced by Senator Niello, aims to enhance pupil health by requiring public schools to provide emergency epinephrine delivery systems for students experiencing anaphylactic reactions. The existing law mandates the provision of emergency epinephrine auto-injectors. However, this bill revises these provisions to require the more effective epinephrine delivery systems to be stocked at each public school for immediate use. These systems are to be made accessible for trained personnel or school nurses to administer as needed.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding SB 568 is largely supportive, as stakeholders emphasize the critical nature of enhancing safety measures for students who may suffer severe allergic reactions. Advocates for pupil health recognize the urgency of updating existing laws to ensure that schools are prepared to handle such emergencies accurately and promptly. With an increased focus on health and safety in school environments, this bill has received positive reception from public health officials and educational stakeholders alike.

Contention

Despite the general support, SB 568 has faced some contention regarding the mandated responsibilities placed on school districts and the potential financial implications. Opponents express concerns about the adequacy of funding and resources that may be needed to implement these new provisions effectively. There is also a discussion around the potential civil liabilities for volunteers administering the epinephrine delivery systems, which could affect school staff's willingness to participate in emergency response roles.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA AB228

Pupil health: epinephrine delivery systems.

MS HB339

School districts; require all schools to have epinephrine auto-injectors in every building and cafeteria.

IL HB3454

EPINEPHRINE DELIVERY DEVICE

NC H397

Use of Epinephrine Nasal Spray

MS HB346

School districts; require each school to have epinephrine auto-injectors and AEDs in every building and cafeteria.

TX SB1619

Relating to the use of an epinephrine delivery device by certain entities.

TX HB2283

Relating to the use of an epinephrine delivery device by certain entities.

UT HB0333

Medications in Schools Amendments