California 2023-2024 Regular Session

California Assembly Bill AB2317

Introduced
2/12/24  
Introduced
2/12/24  
Refer
2/26/24  
Refer
2/26/24  
Report Pass
3/20/24  
Report Pass
3/20/24  
Refer
3/21/24  
Refer
3/21/24  
Report Pass
4/3/24  
Report Pass
4/3/24  
Refer
4/3/24  
Refer
4/3/24  
Report Pass
4/11/24  
Report Pass
4/11/24  
Refer
4/11/24  
Refer
4/11/24  
Refer
4/24/24  
Refer
4/24/24  
Report Pass
5/16/24  
Report Pass
5/16/24  
Engrossed
5/21/24  
Engrossed
5/21/24  
Refer
5/22/24  
Refer
5/22/24  
Refer
5/29/24  
Refer
5/29/24  
Report Pass
6/18/24  
Refer
6/18/24  
Refer
6/18/24  
Report Pass
7/3/24  
Report Pass
7/3/24  
Refer
7/3/24  
Refer
7/3/24  
Refer
8/5/24  
Refer
8/5/24  
Report Pass
8/15/24  
Report Pass
8/15/24  
Enrolled
8/31/24  
Enrolled
8/31/24  
Chaptered
9/25/24  
Passed
9/25/24  

Caption

Child day care facilities: anaphylactic policy.

Impact

The legislation requires child day care facilities to implement the newly established anaphylactic policy by January 1, 2028. This implementation will involve notifying parents or guardians about the policy upon their child's enrollment. Additionally, starting from January 1, 2026, individuals who are required to receive health and safety training will need to undergo pediatric first aid or CPR training that includes instruction on how to handle anaphylactic emergencies. Notably, the bill imposes criminal penalties for willful violations of its provisions, underscoring its importance within state regulatory frameworks.

Summary

Assembly Bill 2317, introduced by Assemblymember Stephanie Nguyen, focuses on enhancing the safety protocols in child day care facilities across California regarding the management of anaphylaxis. The bill seeks to amend the California Child Day Care Facilities Act by instituting a comprehensive anaphylactic policy that mandates the establishment of guidelines aimed at preventing children from experiencing anaphylactic reactions while under care. With a deadline set for July 1, 2027, the State Department of Social Services is tasked with developing this policy in consultation with the Emergency Medical Services Authority and the State Department of Education.

Sentiment

Overall, the sentiment surrounding AB 2317 appears positive, with supporters advocating for increased protections for children with allergies. They view the bill as a necessary measure to equip child care personnel with the skills needed to effectively manage potentially life-threatening situations. Nonetheless, some concerns were raised regarding the training requirements and the implications of liability for facilities, yet these have largely been overshadowed by the bill's commitment to child safety.

Contention

The primary contention in the discussions surrounding AB 2317 has been the adequacy of training and the potential burden placed on child day care facilities. Some opponents argue that the not-yet-validated efficacy of such training programs might not justify the costs associated with implementing the anaphylactic policy. Additionally, there are concerns regarding the readiness of day care personnel to handle emergencies effectively, given the varying degrees of existing knowledge and expertise among staff members.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA AB2042

Child daycare facilities: anaphylactic policy.

CA AB3342

Child daycare facilities: emergency epinephrine auto-injectors.

CA AB1651

Pupil health: emergency medical care: epinephrine auto-injectors.

CA AB228

Pupil health: epinephrine delivery systems.

CA AB2714

Pupil health: epinephrine delivery systems.

CA SB568

Pupil health: epinephrine delivery systems: public schools and programs.

MS HB251

School districts; require all schools to have epinephrine auto-injectors in every building and cafeteria.

MS HB55

School districts; require all schools to have epinephrine auto-injectors in every building and cafeteria.