California 2019-2020 Regular Session

California Senate Bill SB328

Introduced
2/15/19  
Introduced
2/15/19  
Refer
2/28/19  
Refer
2/28/19  
Refer
3/25/19  
Report Pass
4/24/19  
Report Pass
4/24/19  
Refer
4/24/19  
Refer
5/8/19  
Refer
5/8/19  
Report Pass
5/16/19  
Report Pass
5/16/19  
Engrossed
5/21/19  
Refer
5/30/19  
Refer
5/30/19  
Report Pass
7/11/19  
Report Pass
7/11/19  
Refer
7/11/19  
Refer
7/11/19  
Report Pass
8/30/19  
Enrolled
9/14/19  
Enrolled
9/14/19  
Chaptered
10/13/19  
Chaptered
10/13/19  
Passed
10/13/19  

Caption

Pupil attendance: school start time.

Impact

The bill imposes new requirements on school districts to adjust their daily schedules accordingly. This change introduces a state-mandated local program that may contain financial implications for individual school districts and charter schools. To mitigate any associated costs, the bill stipulates that if the Commission on State Mandates recognizes costs imposed by this act, local agencies would be reimbursed through specified provisions of law. This requirement aims to alleviate the financial burden that may come with the restructuring of school hours.

Summary

Senate Bill 328, authored by Senator Portantino, addresses the school start times for middle and high school students in California. Under this legislation, middle school classes must start no earlier than 8:00 a.m., and high school classes no earlier than 8:30 a.m., effective by July 1, 2022. The bill applies to all public middle and high schools, including charter schools, although it provides an exemption for rural districts. The legislation aims to promote improved pupil attendance and overall academic performance by aligning school hours with research that supports the necessity for later start times for adolescents.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding SB 328 is largely supportive, with proponents arguing that later start times will benefit students by addressing issues of sleep deprivation and enhancing their mental health and academic success. Supporters, including educators and health professionals, emphasize the importance of aligning school schedules with adolescent circadian rhythms. However, some concerns have been raised by opponents, particularly regarding the logistical challenges and the potential impact on after-school activities and transportation schedules, emphasizing the need for careful planning and communication as districts implement these changes.

Contention

Although the debate has been predominantly focused on the health benefits associated with later start times, there are notable points of contention. Critics worry about the feasibility of transitioning to later hours and how it could affect families, particularly those reliant on traditional work schedules. Additionally, some lawmakers have expressed concern regarding the flexibility of local school districts in responding to their unique community needs. The bill encourages local engagement and collaboration among stakeholders to facilitate a successful adaptation to the new requirements.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA SB328

Local educational agencies: before and after school programs: middle school and high school start time.

CA SB1125

Local educational agencies: educational programs.

CA SB328

Pupil attendance: school start time.

CA SB348

Pupil meals.

CA AB1871

Charter schools: free and reduced-price meals.

CA AB10

Pupil instruction: in-person instruction: distance learning.

CA SB364

Pupil meals.