California 2019-2020 Regular Session

California Senate Bill SB348

Introduced
2/19/19  
Introduced
2/19/19  
Refer
2/28/19  
Refer
2/28/19  
Report Pass
4/9/19  
Report Pass
4/9/19  
Refer
4/9/19  
Refer
4/9/19  
Report Pass
5/17/19  
Engrossed
5/23/19  
Engrossed
5/23/19  
Refer
6/6/19  
Refer
6/6/19  
Report Pass
6/26/19  
Report Pass
6/26/19  
Refer
6/27/19  
Refer
6/27/19  
Report Pass
7/3/19  

Caption

Department of Technology: artificial intelligence: strategic plans.

Impact

The implementation of SB 348 is expected to significantly impact existing state laws regarding technology and automated systems in public services. It promotes the use of AI in various capacities, from improving job efficiency to ensuring data-driven decision-making within state agencies. The strategic plans must also address the possible implications of AI on employment within these departments, focusing on minimizing adverse effects on job responsibilities and workforce classifications, which indicates a balancing act between innovation and workforce stability.

Summary

Senate Bill 348, introduced by Senator Chang, aims to enhance the utilization of artificial intelligence (AI) within California's government agencies, particularly the Department of Technology and the Department of Motor Vehicles. The bill mandates the directors of these departments to devise strategic plans for incorporating AI technology in state services, thus potentially modernizing the operational frameworks for public services. By establishing guidelines for technology integration, the bill seeks to streamline processes, improve efficiency, and enhance overall service delivery to the public.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding SB 348 appears largely positive among proponents, who view the integration of AI as a progressive step towards modernizing government functions and improving citizen services. Nonetheless, there are concerns regarding job displacement and privacy issues associated with the utilization of AI, which will require careful consideration and ethical oversight. Advocates emphasize the importance of a strategic framework that not only enhances performance but also protects workers and citizen rights.

Contention

Notable points of contention include the adequacy of safeguards against potential privacy violations that might arise from increased AI usage. Additionally, while the bill aims to advance efficiency, critics argue that it could lead to job losses if the transition to AI is not managed effectively. Therefore, the strategic plans mandated by the bill must comprehensively address the intersection of innovation with ethical implications, particularly concerning how AI could alter the landscape of state employment and citizen privacy.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA AB594

Artificial intelligence.

CA SB896

Generative Artificial Intelligence Accountability Act.

HI HB1384

Relating To Artificial Intelligence.

CA AB2885

Artificial intelligence.

CA SB721

General plan: annual report: suite-style student housing quarters.

KY HB672

AN ACT relating to protection of information and declaring an emergency.

KY SB4

AN ACT relating to protection of information and declaring an emergency.

CT SB00002

An Act Concerning Artificial Intelligence.