California 2019-2020 Regular Session

California Senate Bill SB465

Introduced
2/21/19  
Introduced
2/21/19  
Refer
3/7/19  
Refer
3/7/19  
Refer
3/25/19  
Refer
3/25/19  
Refer
4/3/19  
Refer
4/3/19  
Report Pass
4/23/19  
Refer
4/23/19  
Refer
4/23/19  
Report Pass
5/16/19  
Report Pass
5/16/19  
Engrossed
5/23/19  
Engrossed
5/23/19  
Refer
6/13/19  
Refer
6/13/19  
Refer
6/26/19  
Refer
6/26/19  
Report Pass
7/11/19  
Report Pass
7/11/19  

Caption

San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station: emergency planning funding.

Impact

Through this legislation, local governments within the emergency planning zones are ensured ongoing financial resources to fulfill their responsibilities in emergency management related to the nuclear facility. Specifically, SB465 requires the relevant office and controller to provide funding to cover costs that local governments incur for safety and welfare activities associated with SONGS. This covers areas not reimbursed by federal funds and will enable local agencies to remain prepared to address emergencies as they arise, fostering a proactive approach to community safety.

Summary

Senate Bill 465, presented by Senator Bates, addresses emergency planning and funding in the context of the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS). Following the permanent decommissioning of Units 2 and 3 of SONGS, which was announced in 2013, there emerged a critical gap in funding for local emergency response organizations that necessitate comprehensive emergency planning to safeguard public health and safety in the surrounding communities. The bill aims to mandate continued funding for local governments to maintain effective emergency response plans until all nuclear waste and radiological fuel is removed from the SONGS site.

Sentiment

The sentiment regarding SB465 is generally supportive among those who prioritize community safety and emergency preparedness. Lawmakers and local agencies see the bill as an essential step towards ensuring that adequate resources are available for emergency response. However, there is also a nuanced conversation around the adequacy of funding and whether it is sufficient to meet the evolving challenges posed by the decommissioned facility. The ongoing management of spent fuel and radiological materials remains a point of concern among stakeholders.

Contention

A notable point of contention arises from the timeline for audits and future adjustments to funding levels outlined in the bill. There are perspectives on whether the proposed measures are sufficient and timely enough to address the changing risks associated with the decommissioned SONGS site as fuel removal progresses. Moreover, discussions are ongoing about the ongoing partnership and information sharing between utility companies and local governmental agencies, especially as risks decline over time. Ensuring accountability and transparency in how funding is utilized will also be critical to the bill’s implementation.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA AB3097

Radiologist assistants.

CA SB480

Law enforcement uniforms.

CA SB1348

Postsecondary education: allied health professional clinical programs: reporting.

CA SB695

Professions and vocations: applications and renewals: individual tax identification number.

CA SB377

Radiologist assistants.

CA AB1533

Electricity.

CA SB1012

Oil and gas wells: hazardous or idle-deserted wells and facilities.

CA AB918

Health care district: County of Imperial.