California 2019-2020 Regular Session

California Senate Bill SB516

Introduced
2/21/19  
Refer
3/7/19  
Refer
3/25/19  
Refer
3/25/19  
Refer
4/3/19  
Report Pass
4/24/19  
Report Pass
4/24/19  
Refer
4/24/19  
Refer
4/24/19  
Failed
2/3/20  

Caption

Evidence of participation in a criminal street gang.

Impact

By implementing these changes, SB 516 modifies how gang-related charges are prosecuted in California. It places an emphasis on fair trials by ensuring that the admission of gang evidence does not cloud the jury's judgment regarding the underlying charges. This adjustment could significantly impact how evidence is presented in criminal trials and might lead to more careful consideration of gang-related implications in the judicial process.

Summary

Senate Bill 516, introduced by Senator Skinner, amends the Evidence Code with respect to trials involving participation in criminal street gangs. The bill mandates that any case involving a gang enhancement charge under Section 186.22 of the Penal Code must be tried in separate phases. First, the trier of fact determines guilt regarding the underlying offense. If found guilty, the trier then must assess the truth of the gang enhancement allegation. This bifurcated trial procedure aims to minimize the undue prejudice that may arise from presenting gang-related evidence alongside other criminal charges.

Sentiment

The general sentiment surrounding SB 516 appears to be supportive among those who advocate for justice reform and fair trial practices. Proponents argue that the bifurcation of trials reduces bias and potential juror confusion regarding the role of gang evidence, thus fostering a fairer legal environment. However, critics may express concerns that such changes could hinder the prosecution of gang-related crimes, possibly leading to more lenient outcomes for defendants involved in gang activities.

Contention

Notable points of contention may arise regarding the implications of bifurcating trials. Critics might argue that separating gang evidence could limit jurors' understanding of the full context of a crime, potentially undermining the prosecution's case. The balance between ensuring a fair trial and providing jurors with all pertinent information is likely to be a significant point of debate as this bill is further discussed and analyzed within Legislative circles.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA AB644

Public postsecondary education: campus safety: hate crime: surveys.

CA AB2030

CalWORKs: accommodations.

CA AB2276

Motor vehicle insurance: auto body repair.

CA AB1712

Public postsecondary education: campus safety: online survey tool.

CA AB1234

Standardized tests.

CA AB1929

Child abuse and neglect reporting.

CA SB1027

State employee survey.

CA SB857

Advisory task force: LGBTQ+ pupil needs.