California 2019-2020 Regular Session

California Senate Bill SB627

Introduced
2/22/19  
Introduced
2/22/19  
Refer
3/14/19  
Refer
3/14/19  
Refer
3/28/19  
Refer
3/28/19  
Report Pass
4/29/19  
Report Pass
4/29/19  
Refer
4/30/19  
Refer
4/30/19  
Report Pass
5/16/19  
Report Pass
5/16/19  
Engrossed
5/23/19  
Engrossed
5/23/19  
Refer
6/6/19  
Refer
6/6/19  
Report Pass
8/12/19  
Report Pass
8/12/19  
Refer
8/13/19  
Refer
8/13/19  
Refer
8/11/20  

Caption

Cannabis and cannabis products: medicinal use on an animal: veterinary medicine.

Impact

The implementation of SB 627 will significantly alter the legal landscape concerning veterinary medicine and the use of cannabis. By permitting licensed veterinarians to recommend cannabis for animal patients, the bill aims to provide alternative therapeutic options for animal conditions that may benefit from such treatments. It also establishes guidelines for the confidentiality of veterinarians’ recommendations, aligning them with existing protections for human patients under the Compassionate Use Act of 1996.

Summary

Senate Bill 627, introduced by Senator Galgiani, amends existing California laws to allow the medicinal use of cannabis and cannabis products specifically for animals, under certain conditions. The bill creates exceptions in the California Uniform Controlled Substances Act, which typically prohibits prescribing controlled substances, thus enabling veterinarians to recommend cannabis as a treatment for various conditions in their animal patients. This legislative move follows the public adoption of similar measures regarding the medicinal use of cannabis in humans, reflecting a trend towards broader applications of cannabis in healthcare settings.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding SB 627 appears largely positive among advocates for animal rights and alternative medicine, viewing the bill as a progressive step towards treating animal ailments. Supporters argue that it empowers veterinarians to use a wider range of treatments to enhance animal welfare. However, there are potential concerns about misuse and the possibility that veterinarians could exploit this law, leading to divided opinions in the veterinary community regarding the ethical implications of using cannabis in animal healthcare.

Contention

Opposition to the bill primarily revolves around fears of inadequate regulation concerning the recommendation and sale of cannabis products for animals. Critics argue that while the intentions behind SB 627 are valid, the potential for improper use or over-prescription could create public health issues. Additionally, there are apprehensions about the challenges of ensuring that veterinarians adhere to established guidelines and do not deviate from best practices in their recommendations.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA AB2215

Veterinarians: cannabis: animals.

CA AB384

Cannabis and cannabis products: animals: veterinary medicine.

CA AB1885

Cannabis and cannabis products: animals: veterinary medicine.

OK HB2179

Medical marijuana; licensing requirements for medical marijuana dispensaries, commercial growers, and processors; fees; effective date.

CA SB185

Cannabis: marketing.

CA AB3261

Cannabis.

CA SB34

Cannabis: donations.