Dogs and cats: microchip implants.
The law modifies existing statutes on the handling timeframe for stray pets and introduces a new requirement for microchipping as part of the adoption process. This aims to ensure that lost pets can be quickly identified and reunited with their owners. By mandating microchipping, the bill seeks to improve the chances of lost pets returning home while reducing the number of stray animals. It also includes provisions for situations where microchipping is not feasible due to medical reasons.
Senate Bill 64, introduced by Senator Chang and co-authored by various assembly members, focuses on enhancing tracking and accountability for dogs and cats through mandatory microchipping. The bill stipulates that public animal control agencies, shelters, and rescue groups cannot release a dog or cat for reclaiming, adoption, sale, or gifting unless the animal is microchipped with current owner information. Furthermore, if a shelter does not have the means to microchip on site, they must obtain a written agreement from the person claiming the animal to provide proof of microchipping within 30 days.
The sentiment surrounding SB 64 appears generally supportive among animal welfare advocates, as it aligns with efforts to increase pet safety and reduce euthanasia rates in shelters. However, there may be some concern regarding the implications for pet owners who might not be knowledgeable about microchipping or those who lack easy access to these services. There is an emphasis on the practical benefits of the bill, such as facilitating easier identification of pets, while also considering the responsibilities placed on shelters and the owners themselves.
While the overarching goal of SB 64 is to enhance the protection and reunification of pets and their owners, discussions may arise regarding enforcement aspects and penalties for non-compliance. Shelters that fail to comply with the microchipping mandate after January 1, 2022, face a civil penalty of $100. This could lead to debates over additional financial burdens on shelters and rescue groups, especially those already limited in resources. Nevertheless, the emphasis remains on the positive outcomes the bill aims to achieve in the responsible handling of animals.