California 2021-2022 Regular Session

California Assembly Bill AB2723

Introduced
2/18/22  
Refer
3/10/22  
Report Pass
3/29/22  
Refer
3/29/22  
Report Pass
4/20/22  
Refer
4/21/22  
Refer
4/25/22  
Report Pass
5/11/22  
Engrossed
5/19/22  
Refer
5/19/22  
Refer
6/1/22  
Report Pass
6/14/22  
Enrolled
8/22/22  
Chaptered
9/26/22  

Caption

Animals: microchips.

Impact

With the enactment of AB 2723, state laws governing pet adoption will tighten, leading to a significant reduction in ownership ambiguities. Agencies and shelters must maintain detailed records of microchipping and ownership. Should they fail to comply, they may face a civil penalty of $100. Furthermore, if economic hardship prevents microchipping, owners can submit a signed statement for exemption, though this acknowledgment adds a layer of accountability for agencies facilitating adoptions.

Summary

Assembly Bill No. 2723, authored by Holden, amends Sections 31108.3 and 31752.1 of the Food and Agricultural Code to enhance the regulation around the microchipping of dogs and cats. The bill mandates that a public animal control agency, shelter, humane society, or rescue group may not release a dog or cat for reclaiming or adoption unless the animal is microchipped, and the owner is registered with the microchip company as the primary owner. This change aims to ensure that pet ownership is clearly established and that lost animals can be reliably returned to their owners.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding AB 2723 appears generally positive among animal welfare advocates, as it strengthens accountability for animal control and enhances the chances of reunification for lost pets. However, there are concerns from some corners regarding the potential burden placed on shelters, particularly those lacking resources for microchipping. The complexities surrounding documentation requirements could complicate the process of adoption, leading to debates on practicality versus protection.

Contention

Some points of contention during discussions about AB 2723 include the implications of microchip registration, as the bill explicitly prohibits agencies from being noted as the primary owner of a microchipped animal. This is intended to shift ownership responsibilities to new pet owners, ensuring greater accountability. Critics remain concerned that the complexity could deter potential adopters, especially those from low-income backgrounds, by adding further requirements in an already challenging adoption process.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA SB573

Dogs and cats: microchip implants.

CA SB64

Dogs and cats: microchip implants.

CA AB1482

Bowie’s Law: animals: adoption, shelter overcrowding, and breeding.

CA AB2425

Bowie’s Law: animals: adoption, shelter overcrowding, and breeding.

CA AB702

Animal welfare: Dog and Cat Bill of Rights.

MD SB157

Domestic Animals - Penalties for Abandonment and Microchip Requirements for Dogs

IL HB2793

ANIMAL WELFARE-PRO BREEDER

CA AB1881

Animal welfare: Dog and Cat Bill of Rights.