California 2019-2020 Regular Session

California Senate Bill SB66

Introduced
1/8/19  
Introduced
1/8/19  
Refer
1/16/19  
Refer
1/16/19  
Report Pass
3/20/19  
Refer
3/21/19  
Report Pass
5/16/19  
Report Pass
5/16/19  
Engrossed
5/23/19  
Engrossed
5/23/19  
Refer
6/3/19  
Refer
6/3/19  
Report Pass
7/3/19  
Report Pass
7/3/19  
Refer
7/3/19  
Refer
7/3/19  
Report Pass
8/30/19  

Caption

Medi-Cal: federally qualified health center and rural health clinic services.

Impact

The proposed legislation seeks to streamline healthcare delivery within the Medi-Cal program by enabling FQHCs and RHCs to bill separately for services. This is expected to improve the financial sustainability of these health centers by allowing them to adjust their reimbursement rates based on new applicable services. Additionally, the inclusion of licensed acupuncturists as reimbursable providers underlines a broader approach to healthcare, recognizing alternative treatment options as legitimate avenues for patient care. Such enhancements could lead to improved patient outcomes and lower barriers to accessing comprehensive health services.

Summary

Senate Bill 66, introduced by Senators Atkins and McGuire, aims to enhance the Medi-Cal program by amending Section 14132.100 of the Welfare and Institutions Code. The bill sets out to increase healthcare access for low-income individuals through Federally Qualified Health Centers (FQHCs) and Rural Health Clinics (RHCs). Specifically, it allows for reimbursement for a maximum of two visits on the same day at a single location if a patient suffers from illness or injury after the first visit or has distinct medical and mental health consultations on the same day. This provision is designed to better accommodate patient needs, especially for those requiring multiple types of care in one visit.

Sentiment

The sentiment around SB 66 appears largely positive, primarily from those who advocate for expanded healthcare access and improved patient services. Advocates argue that by allowing multiple reimbursable visits and accommodating diverse healthcare needs, this bill will alleviate pressures on FQHCs and RHCs. However, the bill could be met with some skepticism regarding financial implications and the administrative burden it may introduce for health centers in adjusting their billing practices. Overall, the bill reflects a legislative trend towards embracing a more inclusive healthcare strategy.

Contention

While the bill has been mostly well-received, discussions may raise concerns regarding the impact on state budget allocations for Medicaid funding, especially with the requirement for the Department of Health Care Services to submit a state plan amendment to the federal Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. Critics may also voice concerns about the specific implementation details and whether the proposed changes might lead to inconsistencies in reimbursement practices across different types of healthcare providers. Ensuring appropriate training and information dissemination for FQHCs and RHCs will be key to overcoming potential barriers to effective implementation.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA SB1125

Federally qualified health center and rural health clinic services.

CA SB282

Medi-Cal: federally qualified health centers and rural health clinics.

CA SB316

Medi-Cal: federally qualified health centers and rural health clinics.

CA AB1591

Medi-Cal: federally qualified health centers and rural health centers: licensed professional clinical counselor.

CA SB966

Federally qualified health centers and rural health clinics: visits.

CA SB323

Medi-Cal: federally qualified health centers and rural health centers: Drug Medi-Cal and specialty mental health services.

CA AB3344

Medi-Cal: federally qualified health centers and rural health clinics.

CA AB2703

Federally qualified health centers and rural health clinics: psychological associates.