California 2019-2020 Regular Session

California Senate Bill SB690

Introduced
2/22/19  
Refer
3/14/19  
Refer
3/27/19  
Refer
4/3/19  
Report Pass
4/25/19  
Report Pass
4/25/19  
Refer
4/29/19  
Report Pass
5/16/19  
Report Pass
5/16/19  
Engrossed
5/23/19  
Engrossed
5/23/19  
Refer
6/6/19  
Refer
6/25/19  
Report Pass
7/3/19  
Report Pass
7/3/19  
Refer
7/3/19  
Refer
7/3/19  
Refer
8/12/19  
Refer
8/12/19  
Report Pass
8/21/19  
Report Pass
8/21/19  
Enrolled
9/11/19  
Enrolled
9/11/19  
Chaptered
9/27/19  
Chaptered
9/27/19  
Passed
9/27/19  

Caption

Coastal resources: Tijuana River Valley: funding prioritization.

Impact

The enactment of SB 690 is expected to enhance California's capacity to address pollution in the Tijuana River Valley, an area significantly affected by cross-border flows and environmental degradation. By mandating the prioritization of specific studies, this legislation seeks not only to improve environmental health but also to promote sustainable development in coastal areas. Furthermore, it aligns with existing laws that facilitate federal grants and donations, potentially increasing financial support for local conservation efforts.

Summary

Senate Bill No. 690, introduced by Senator Hueso, addresses the pressing environmental issues related to the Tijuana River Valley, specifically focusing on pollution and transboundary flows. The bill aims to add Section 31111.3 to the Public Resources Code, thereby influencing how state funds are allocated to manage and mitigate these environmental challenges. It encourages the State Coastal Conservancy to prioritize projects identified in recent studies when expending funds related to these issues, which reflects a strategic approach to environmental management in the region.

Sentiment

Sentiment around SB 690 appears to be largely supportive, particularly among environmental advocacy groups and local agencies concerned with coastal conservation. The bill's focus on environmental stewardship aligns with broader state initiatives aimed at protecting natural resources and restoring habitats. However, there may be concerns regarding the implementation and effectiveness of the prioritization mechanism, especially from stakeholders who may fear that some projects could be overlooked in favor of others deemed more urgent.

Contention

Notable points of contention may arise regarding the specifics of how the prioritization will be executed and the criteria used to identify which projects receive funding. There is also the potential for debate over resource allocation, particularly in balancing the urgent needs of environmental restoration with competing interests in the region. Overall, SB 690 is seen as a significant step toward addressing the environmental issues affecting the Tijuana River Valley, but its success will depend on effective enforcement and collaboration among various stakeholders.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA AB1596

Watershed, Clean Beaches, and Water Quality Act: beaches: water quality.

CA SR57

Relative to the Tijuana River.

CA SB1301

Tijuana River Valley: watershed action plan.

CA SB10

Otay Mesa East Toll Facility Act: toll revenues.

CA SJR22

Tijuana River Valley.

US HB2556

CORE Act of 2025 Comprehensive Offshore Resource Enhancement Act of 2025

CA AJR4

Basel Convention: ratification.

HI SR88

Urging The Department Of Land And Natural Resources To Protect Hawaii's Waters And Resources By Prohibiting Seabed Mining.