California 2019-2020 Regular Session

California Senate Bill SB989

Introduced
2/12/20  
Introduced
2/12/20  
Refer
2/20/20  
Refer
2/20/20  
Refer
5/14/20  
Refer
5/14/20  
Report Pass
5/27/20  
Report Pass
5/27/20  
Refer
5/27/20  
Refer
5/27/20  
Report Pass
6/18/20  
Engrossed
6/24/20  
Engrossed
6/24/20  
Refer
6/29/20  
Report Pass
8/10/20  
Report Pass
8/10/20  

Caption

Sierra Nevada Conservancy: Sierra Nevada Region: subregion: definitions: annual report.

Impact

The amendments proposed in SB 989 are significant as they not only reshape how the Sierra Nevada Conservancy defines its operational regions but also enhance the requirements for transparency and accountability through annual reporting. This includes reporting on expenditures as well as land management costs. Moreover, the conservancy will have to adjust its structure to accommodate the regions of Shasta, Siskiyou, and Trinity, reflecting its expanded jurisdiction. Such changes are anticipated to influence the management practices regarding conservation efforts and potentially enhance collaboration among local public agencies.

Summary

Senate Bill 989, introduced by Senator Dahle, aims to amend various sections of the Public Resources Code related to the Sierra Nevada Conservancy. The bill modifies the definitions pertaining to the Sierra Nevada Region and its subregions, thereby impacting the conservancy's legislative and operational structure. This includes refining the geographical scope and administrative responsibilities of the conservancy in relation to its coverage of specific areas within California's Sierra Nevada Region. Additionally, the bill mandates the conservancy to include recommendations for legislative changes in its annual reports, aiding in greater alignment with its recent expansions.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding SB 989 appears supportive, particularly among those who advocate for enhanced conservation measures and responsible land management. Stakeholders, including environmental groups, are likely to view these amendments favorably, as they provide clearer delineations of responsibilities for the conservancy. However, there may be some apprehension regarding how these changes will be implemented on the ground, particularly in relation to local engagement in conservation efforts.

Contention

Notable points of contention may arise regarding the delineation of subregions and whether the specified changes adequately represent the diverse ecological and community needs of the Sierra Nevada area. The bill's impact on existing conservation strategies and potential shifts in resource allocation will also be under scrutiny. Additionally, there could be debates about the adequacy of the conservancy's recommendations and their practical implications for local entities and stakeholders, especially those concerned with specific environmental issues or community interests.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA SB208

Sierra Nevada Conservancy: Sierra Nevada Region: subregion: definitions: annual report.

CA SB841

Sierra Nevada Conservancy: Sierra Nevada Region: definition: annual report.

CA SB39

Sierra Nevada Conservancy: Sierra Nevada Region: subregions: climate resilience and equity.

CA AB2849

Sierra Nevada Conservancy: watershed improvement: tribal organization.

CA AB1426

Public resources: San Onofre State Beach: Richard H. and Donna O’Neill Conservancy: road construction.

CA AB2597

Planning and zoning: revision of housing element: regional housing need allocation appeals: Southern California Association of Governments.

CA AB829

Local government: funding: state-assisted projects.

CA AB350

Regional transportation plans: Sacramento Area Council of Governments.