California Assembly Bill AB1238

California 2021-2022 Regular Session

• Introduced: 2/19/21
• Refer: 3/25/21
• Report Pass: 3/25/21
• Refer: 3/26/21
• Report Pass: 4/12/21
• Refer: 4/13/21
• Report Pass: 4/27/21
• Refer: 4/27/21
• Refer: 5/19/21
• Report Pass: 5/20/21
• Engrossed: 6/2/21
• Refer: 6/3/21
• Refer: 6/9/21
• Report Pass: 7/5/21
• Refer: 7/6/21
• Refer: 7/15/21
• Report Pass: 8/26/21
• Enrolled: 9/9/21
• Vetoed: 10/8/21

Caption

Pedestrian access.

Impact

The impact of AB 1238 on state law is significant as it adjusts the legal framework governing pedestrian movements in California. By allowing pedestrians to cross at various points instead of strictly at crosswalks, and by exempting them from fines for crossing when no cars are present, the bill aims to increase accessibility and reduce legal penalties for pedestrians. Additionally, it mandates the California Highway Patrol to produce an annual report on pedestrian injuries and fatalities, potentially informing future safety initiatives and legislative efforts.

Summary

Assembly Bill 1238, introduced by Assembly Members Ting and Friedman, seeks to amend several sections of the Vehicle Code related to pedestrian access and rights. The bill aims to modify existing rules that govern how pedestrians interact with traffic signals and cross the road. Key provisions include the repeal of certain prohibitions against entering roadways while facing yellow signals and the requirement to yield to vehicles unless within crosswalks. These changes are set to remain in effect until January 1, 2029, with the intention of enhancing pedestrian fluidity and safety.

Sentiment

General sentiment around AB 1238 appears mixed. Proponents likely view the bill as a progressive step towards improving pedestrian rights and safety, suggesting it could lead to reduced pedestrian injuries by allowing more flexible crossing options. Conversely, critics may express concerns about potential increases in pedestrian accidents as a result of these liberalized crossing rules, arguing that unregulated crossings could compromise safety where vehicular traffic is heavy.

Contention

Notable points of contention regarding AB 1238 focus on balancing pedestrian freedom with traffic safety. Critics warn that easing the restrictions on pedestrian crossings could result in more accidents, especially in busy urban areas. Additionally, the repeal of local authority to impose stricter pedestrian regulations raises fears that communities might not be able to adequately address specific safety concerns unique to their areas, potentially undermining local governance and prioritizing a one-size-fits-all approach to pedestrian laws.