California Assembly Bill AB1390

California 2021-2022 Regular Session

• Introduced: 2/19/21
• Refer: 3/11/21
• Report Pass: 4/19/21
• Refer: 4/20/21
• Report Pass: 4/29/21
• Refer: 4/29/21
• Report Pass: 5/19/21
• Engrossed: 5/24/21
• Refer: 5/25/21
• Refer: 6/3/21
• Report Pass: 6/29/21
• Refer: 6/30/21
• Refer: 7/15/21
• Report Pass: 8/26/21
• Enrolled: 9/9/21
• Chaptered: 10/8/21
• Passed: 10/8/21

Caption

State lands: school and lieu lands.

Impact

One of the major changes brought about by AB 1390 includes the repeal of existing laws that mandated the preparation of master plans for school lands. This repeal is intended to facilitate more efficient decision-making regarding the lands. Additionally, the bill allows the State Lands Commission to notify legislative chairs and members of proposed land conveyances with a minimum notice period, enhancing transparency. It also introduces provisions that permit the commission to sell school lands without reserving easements if deemed in the best interest of the state, which may influence how public lands are utilized and developed.

Summary

Assembly Bill 1390, introduced by Boerner Horvath, addresses the management and disposition of state lands, specifically focusing on school and lieu lands. The bill amends several sections of the Public Resources Code, making significant adjustments to the requirements for the State Lands Commission. It aims to streamline the process of land conveyance and management, eliminating the need for a master plan and allowing greater flexibility for the commission in real property transactions. Furthermore, the bill introduces new notification requirements to ensure legislative oversight in decisions to convey state lands.

Sentiment

The sentiment among stakeholders regarding AB 1390 appears to be divided. Supporters argue that the changes will modernize land management practices and foster economic development by allowing quicker decisions regarding land use. Conversely, critics express concern that these amendments may undermine necessary protections and oversight, potentially resulting in irresponsible land use and a lack of accountability in the management of school lands.

Contention

Notable points of contention surrounding AB 1390 center on the potential impacts of allowing the commission to sell lands without fundamental easement rights reserved. Opponents fear this could lead to detrimental outcomes for public access and the preservation of state lands. Additionally, the reduction in reporting requirements, while intended to streamline processes, may diminish legislative oversight, which advocates for transparency argue is crucial for public trust and accountability.