California 2021-2022 Regular Session

California Assembly Bill AB1476

Introduced
2/19/21  
Introduced
2/19/21  
Refer
3/11/21  
Refer
3/11/21  
Report Pass
3/25/21  
Refer
4/6/21  
Refer
4/6/21  
Report Pass
4/14/21  
Report Pass
4/14/21  
Engrossed
4/22/21  
Refer
4/26/21  
Refer
5/12/21  
Refer
5/12/21  
Report Pass
7/8/21  
Report Pass
7/8/21  
Refer
7/8/21  
Refer
7/8/21  
Enrolled
9/9/21  
Enrolled
9/9/21  
Chaptered
10/8/21  
Chaptered
10/8/21  
Passed
10/8/21  

Caption

Park property: City of Modesto: Beard Brook Park.

Impact

The enactment of AB 1476 has significant implications for local governance, particularly in how cities manage and regulate their park resources. By permitting the City of Modesto to sell or dispose of park land under specified conditions, the bill creates a framework within which municipalities can adapt to urban development needs while ensuring that the replacement properties meet recreational standards. This legislative action conveys an understanding of the need for flexibility in local park management amid community growth and changing recreational demands.

Summary

Assembly Bill No. 1476, introduced by Assemblymember Gray, addresses the disposal of park property in the City of Modesto, specifically relating to Beard Brook Park. The bill allows Modesto to dispose of portions of this park, which has been developed using grant funds from the Safe Neighborhood Parks, Clean Water, Clean Air, and Coastal Protection Bond Act of 2000. To ensure the city's compliance with existing laws regarding the use of public lands, the bill stipulates that any disposal must be accompanied by the acquisition of replacement park property approved by the Department of Parks and Recreation. The intended use for this replacement property must serve public park purposes in perpetuity and at no cost to the state.

Sentiment

The sentiment around AB 1476 appears to be primarily supportive, particularly among those advocating for increased recreational opportunities in Modesto. Proponents argue that allowing for the disposal of park land allocated for new recreational spaces can benefit the community. However, there may also be concerns from conservation advocates who fear that land disposal could set a precedent for diminishing public access to parkland and failing to adequately preserve environmental integrity. The emphasis on obtaining independent appraisals and ensuring environmental assessments suggests a cautious approach aimed at addressing such concerns.

Contention

A notable point of contention regarding AB 1476 revolves around the specific requirements outlined for disposing of park property. These include the need for independent appraisals to establish fair market value, ensuring that the replacement property must offer equal or greater recreational utility compared to Beard Brook Park, and compliance with environmental standards. Critics may argue that these requirements could complicate the process of land disposal, while supporters contend that they provide necessary safeguards against potential misuse of public land. Ultimately, the debate encapsulates larger themes of urban development versus environmental protection and community engagement.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA SB475

Park property: City of Laguna Woods: City Centre Park.

CA AB3172

Park property: City of Modesto: Beard Brook Park.

CA AB1330

Park property: Ayala Park.

CA AB1190

Parks and recreation: County of San Bernardino: Big Morongo Canyon Preserve.

CA AB2861

Parks and recreation: land transfer: YMCA of the County of San Diego.

CA AB2214

California Environmental Quality Act: schoolsites: acquisition of property: school districts, charter schools, and private schools.

CA AB762

Hazardous emissions and substances: schoolsites: private and charter schools.

CA AB2323

California Environmental Quality Act: exemptions.