California 2025-2026 Regular Session

California Assembly Bill AB385

Introduced
2/3/25  
Refer
2/18/25  
Report Pass
3/10/25  
Refer
3/11/25  
Report Pass
4/22/25  
Refer
4/23/25  
Report Pass
5/1/25  
Refer
5/1/25  
Report Pass
5/14/25  
Engrossed
5/23/25  
Refer
5/23/25  
Refer
6/4/25  
Report Pass
7/2/25  
Refer
7/2/25  
Report Pass
7/9/25  
Refer
7/9/25  
Enrolled
8/29/25  

Caption

Regional park property: County of San Bernardino: Glen Helen Regional Park.

Impact

The bill mandates that, before disposing of any Glen Helen Regional Park property, the county must appraise the fair market value of the area and proposed replacement sites, submit this information to the Department of Parks and Recreation, and secure a final written agreement ensuring the transfer of responsibilities related to any grant contracts to the new property. If by January 1, 2029, the county has not acquired such replacement property, the provisions of the bill will become inoperative.

Summary

Assembly Bill 385, introduced by Assembly Member Ramos, is focused on the Glen Helen Regional Park property located in San Bernardino County. The bill seeks to authorize the county to dispose of up to 4.2 acres of park property while ensuring that any disposal is accompanied by an acquisition of replacement property that holds equal or greater recreational value. It aims to address the requirements set by the Roberti-Zberg-Harris Urban Open-Space and Recreation Program Act, which governs the use of grant moneys provided for park development or improvements.

Sentiment

The sentiment towards AB 385 is largely positive among proponents who see it as a potential avenue to enhance recreational opportunities in San Bernardino County by allowing the county to manage its park assets more effectively. Conversely, there may be concerns regarding the environmental implications of property disposal and the adequacy of the replacement park property proposed by the county, particularly in light of community needs and accessibility.

Contention

Key points of contention surrounding this bill involve the balance between maintaining existing parkland and the merits of acquiring new property. Some stakeholders might raise questions about the adequacy of replacement property and whether environmental assessments are sufficiently thorough to ensure that the new parkland will offer equal or enhanced recreational value to the community compared to what is being disposed of at Glen Helen Regional Park.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Previously Filed As

CA AB3182

Land conservation: California Wildlife, Coastal, and Park Land Conservation Act: County of San Bernardino.

CA SB475

Park property: City of Laguna Woods: City Centre Park.

CA AB598

San Francisco Bay Area Regional Housing Finance Act: regional and county expenditure plans.

CA AB566

Department of Parks and Recreation: acquisition and protection of real property.

CA AB1694

Regional park and open-space districts: general manager: powers.

CA AB2103

Department of Parks and Recreation: Big Basin Redwoods, Año Nuevo, and Butano State Parks: real property acquisition.

CA AB2590

San Bernardino County Transportation Authority: contracting.

CA SB7

Regional housing need: determination.

CA AB1421

The San Diego Regional Film Financial Incentive Pilot Program.

CA SB440

Regional Housing Finance Authorities.

Similar Bills

CA AB3182

Land conservation: California Wildlife, Coastal, and Park Land Conservation Act: County of San Bernardino.

CA SB360

Land conservation: California Wildlife, Coastal, and Park Land Conservation Act: County of San Bernardino.

CA AB1476

Park property: City of Modesto: Beard Brook Park.

CA SB475

Park property: City of Laguna Woods: City Centre Park.

CA AB56

California Infrastructure and Economic Development Bank: housing.

CA AB2293

Carpenter-Presley-Tanner Hazardous Substance Account Act: recodification.

CA AB548

Omnitrans Transit District.

CA SB536

Surplus state real property: Heman G. Stark Youth Correctional Facility.