California 2021-2022 Regular Session

California Assembly Bill AB1743

Introduced
1/31/22  
Introduced
1/31/22  
Refer
3/17/22  
Report Pass
3/17/22  
Report Pass
3/17/22  
Refer
3/21/22  
Refer
3/21/22  
Report Pass
4/27/22  
Refer
4/27/22  
Report Pass
5/11/22  
Engrossed
5/19/22  
Engrossed
5/19/22  
Refer
5/19/22  
Refer
5/19/22  
Refer
6/1/22  
Report Pass
6/13/22  
Refer
6/13/22  
Refer
6/13/22  
Refer
6/14/22  
Refer
6/16/22  
Refer
6/16/22  
Report Pass
6/28/22  
Report Pass
6/28/22  
Refer
6/29/22  
Refer
6/29/22  
Enrolled
8/31/22  
Chaptered
9/28/22  
Chaptered
9/28/22  
Passed
9/28/22  

Caption

General plan: annual report.

Impact

The bill's implications on state laws are significant, as it establishes new reporting requirements that local jurisdictions must adhere to in their planning processes. While its intent is to facilitate better tracking and understanding of housing development approvals versus disapprovals, it introduces a state-mandated program for local agencies. This means that local governments must bear the responsibility of complying with these new requirements without financial reimbursement from the state, which may strain their resources.

Summary

Assembly Bill 1743, sponsored by McKinnor, amends Section 65400 of the Government Code, which pertains to general plans regarding land use for cities and counties in California. The bill mandates that planning agencies include additional details in their annual reports to the Department of Housing and Community Development, specifically indicating whether housing development applications are subject to ministerial or discretionary approval processes. This enhancement aims to improve transparency and accountability in how land use and housing applications are managed across various jurisdictions in the state.

Sentiment

Overall, the sentiment surrounding AB 1743 appears to be supportive, particularly among proponents of housing development and state transparency in land use practices. Supporters believe that having detailed reporting will enhance the public's understanding of housing growth and planning processes. However, there are concerns from local governments regarding the additional burdens this might impose, especially given the lack of state reimbursement for the associated costs.

Contention

Notable points of contention include the financial burdens imposed on local agencies due to the new reporting requirements. Critics have raised concerns about whether local governments will effectively manage these additional responsibilities without state support. Additionally, there are apprehensions regarding the definitions of ministerial and discretionary approvals, as these could influence the decision-making processes of planning agencies and impact housing development timelines.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA SB1037

Planning and zoning: housing element: enforcement.

CA AB2094

General plan: annual report: extremely low-income housing.

CA AB2694

Density Bonus Law: residential care facilities for the elderly.

CA AB2580

Historical resources.

CA AB2717

Planning and zoning: housing element: annual progress report.

CA AB2144

General plan: annual report.

CA SB721

General plan: annual report: suite-style student housing quarters.

CA AB3086

General plan: annual report: housing units.