California 2021-2022 Regular Session

California Assembly Bill AB2356

Introduced
2/16/22  
Introduced
2/16/22  
Refer
3/3/22  
Refer
3/3/22  
Report Pass
4/7/22  
Report Pass
4/7/22  
Refer
4/18/22  
Refer
4/18/22  
Report Pass
4/20/22  
Report Pass
4/20/22  
Engrossed
5/5/22  
Refer
5/5/22  
Refer
5/18/22  
Refer
5/18/22  
Report Pass
6/1/22  
Report Pass
6/1/22  
Enrolled
6/9/22  
Enrolled
6/9/22  
Chaptered
6/20/22  
Chaptered
6/20/22  

Caption

Theft: aggregation.

Impact

The changes to the California Penal Code brought about by AB2356 align with the Safe Neighborhoods and Schools Act enacted by Proposition 47, which classifies thefts below $950 as petty theft. By allowing for aggregation of theft values over this threshold, the bill is intended to address the loophole that exists in the prosecution of more serious thefts, thereby preventing serial offenders from escaping more severe penalties due to current legal standards.

Summary

Assembly Bill No. 2356, also known as AB2356, amends Section 487 of the California Penal Code regarding the definition and aggregation of theft offenses. The bill aims to clarify how theft from multiple victims can be aggregated into a single charge of grand theft when the total value exceeds $950. This legislation is a response to existing case law that allows for such aggregation when the thefts are part of a common scheme or plan. AB2356 serves to solidify these legal interpretations within the statute itself.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding AB2356 appears to be largely supportive among law enforcement and prosecutorial groups who believe it will help curb theft-related crimes by ensuring that habitual offenders are appropriately charged. However, some community advocates express concern that it may lead to over-prosecution of individuals who may be struggling with socioeconomic issues. There is an acknowledgment that while the intention is to strengthen penalties for clear cases of theft, it also raises questions about the balance between justice and rehabilitation.

Contention

Debates regarding AB2356 focus on the implications of changing the aggregation rules for theft. Proponents argue that it standardizes the approach toward grand theft charges and eliminates ambiguity that has been exploited by defendants. Critics posit that the bill may disproportionately affect lower-income individuals, exacerbating issues of justice within communities where petty theft can often be a symptom of larger socioeconomic challenges. The discussion highlights a tension between enhancing law enforcement tools and addressing the root causes of theft.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA AB1772

Theft: aggregation.

CA AB3011

Theft: aggregation.

CA AB23

Theft: shoplifting: amount.

CA AB1794

Crimes: larceny.

CA AB1787

Theft: shoplifting.

CA SB1381

Crimes: child pornography.

CA AB1603

Theft: shoplifting: amount.

CA AB2943

Crimes: shoplifting.