California 2021-2022 Regular Session

California Assembly Bill AB2370

Introduced
2/16/22  
Introduced
2/16/22  
Refer
3/3/22  
Refer
3/3/22  
Report Pass
3/22/22  
Report Pass
3/22/22  
Refer
3/24/22  
Refer
3/24/22  
Report Pass
4/20/22  
Report Pass
4/20/22  
Refer
4/20/22  
Refer
4/20/22  
Refer
5/4/22  
Refer
5/4/22  
Report Pass
5/19/22  
Engrossed
5/23/22  
Engrossed
5/23/22  
Refer
5/24/22  
Refer
5/24/22  
Refer
6/1/22  
Refer
6/1/22  
Report Pass
6/15/22  
Refer
6/15/22  
Refer
6/15/22  
Refer
6/27/22  

Caption

Public records: state agency retention.

Impact

If enacted, AB 2370 would have significant implications for state law regarding public record retention. By extending the retention period to a minimum of two years, the bill aligns with ongoing efforts to bolster the integrity of public records as required by the California Public Records Act. It emphasizes the necessity for state agencies to manage their records effectively and maintain accessibility for public scrutiny. This change is expected to help facilitate better oversight of government actions and decisions.

Summary

Assembly Bill 2370, introduced by Assembly Member Levine, aims to enhance the retention requirements for public records held by state agencies in California. The bill mandates that state agencies must retain and preserve all public records, including those transmitted via email, for a minimum period of two years. This initiative seeks to ensure that public records remain accessible for public inspection, thereby promoting transparency and accountability within state government operations.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding AB 2370 has been largely positive among advocates of government transparency and accountability. Proponents argue that the bill's provisions will foster a more informed public by ensuring that important governmental documents remain retrievable for an adequate time frame. On the other hand, concerns may arise regarding the operational impact on state agencies, particularly regarding the costs and resources required to comply with the extended retention requirements.

Contention

Notably, there are discussions around the balance this bill seeks to strike between the necessity of public access to records and the practical realities of record-keeping within government agencies. Some stakeholders may contest whether a mandated two-year retention period could impose undue burdens on agencies, potentially diverting resources away from other critical functions. Nonetheless, the overarching theme remains that providing clear and lasting access to public records is crucial to maintaining public trust in government institutions.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA AB1985

Hate crimes: law enforcement policies.

CA SR32

Relative to birthright citizenship.

CA AB2604

Hate crimes.

CA AB600

Hate crimes: immigration status.

CA AB2119

Foster care: gender affirming health care and mental health care.

CA AB2717

Prisoners: California Healthy Start Act.

CA SB1409

Industrial hemp.

CA AB699

Educational equity: immigration and citizenship status.