California 2021-2022 Regular Session

California Assembly Bill AB2551

Introduced
2/17/22  
Introduced
2/17/22  
Refer
3/10/22  
Refer
3/10/22  
Report Pass
4/20/22  
Refer
4/20/22  
Refer
4/20/22  
Report Pass
5/4/22  
Engrossed
5/9/22  
Engrossed
5/9/22  
Refer
5/10/22  
Refer
5/18/22  
Refer
5/18/22  
Report Pass
5/25/22  
Report Pass
5/25/22  
Refer
5/25/22  
Refer
5/25/22  
Report Pass
6/8/22  
Report Pass
6/8/22  
Refer
6/8/22  
Refer
6/8/22  
Report Pass
6/13/22  
Report Pass
6/13/22  
Enrolled
6/30/22  
Enrolled
6/30/22  
Chaptered
7/12/22  
Passed
7/12/22  

Caption

Firearms.

Impact

The enactment of AB 2551 strengthens existing laws by ensuring timely communication between the Department of Justice and local law enforcement. It modifies the Penal Code to create a clear protocol for reporting attempted purchases by prohibited individuals, especially those with mental health issues. This may enhance community safety by enabling prompt law enforcement responses to potential threats. Furthermore, it aligns with the 2016 Safety for All Act that established controls around ammunition sales and firearm precursor parts.

Summary

Assembly Bill 2551, introduced by Assemblymember McCarty, focuses on enhancing firearm regulations in California. The bill mandates that if a person who is prohibited from possessing a firearm attempts to purchase one, the Department of Justice must notify local law enforcement and, in cases related to mental health, the county mental health department as well. This notification aims to keep law enforcement informed about individuals attempting to acquire firearms when they are legally barred from doing so, thereby potentially preventing suicide and gun violence incidents.

Sentiment

The general sentiment around AB 2551 appears overwhelmingly supportive among proponents of gun control and public safety advocates who believe in proactive measures to address gun violence. However, some concerns arise regarding individual privacy and the potential for this legislation to be viewed as an infringement on Second Amendment rights. Detractors may argue that the bill could lead to overreach by law enforcement and the stigmatization of individuals with mental health conditions.

Contention

Notable points of contention regarding AB 2551 center around its implications for personal rights and mental health stigma. While supporters assert that the bill is crucial for public safety, opponents fear it could lead to unjust scrutiny and the potential for wrongful enforcement actions against individuals. The bill's intersection with mental health issues raises an essential debate about how to balance public safety needs with the respect and protection of individual rights.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA AB667

Firearms: Armed Prohibited Persons System.

CA AB3127

Firearms: reports to local law enforcement.

CA AB1237

Information access: research institutions: firearms.

CA SB118

Public safety.

CA AB2382

Firearms: firearm precursor parts.

CA AB88

Public safety.

CA AB173

Public Safety.

CA SB173

Budget Act of 2022.