California 2021-2022 Regular Session

California Assembly Bill AB2640

Introduced
2/18/22  
Refer
3/10/22  
Report Pass
4/18/22  
Refer
4/20/22  
Report Pass
4/27/22  
Engrossed
5/5/22  
Refer
5/5/22  
Refer
5/18/22  
Report Pass
6/15/22  
Refer
6/15/22  
Enrolled
8/18/22  
Chaptered
9/29/22  

Caption

Pupil health: food allergies: California Food Allergy Resource internet web page.

Impact

The implementation of AB 2640 is expected to enhance the awareness and preparedness of educational institutions regarding food allergies. By equipping schools with easily accessible and comprehensive resources, the bill facilitates the development of individualized food allergy management plans for students. This initiative is likely to promote safer school environments, helping educational agencies respond effectively to food allergy emergencies and reduce the risks associated with allergic reactions among pupils.

Summary

Assembly Bill 2640, known as the Zacky Bill, addresses pupil health in the context of food allergies. It mandates the creation of a California Food Allergy Resource internet web page by the State Department of Education. This resource is aimed at providing guidance to local educational agencies, including school districts and charter schools, for developing effective strategies to protect pupils with food allergies. The bill emphasizes the need to ensure inclusivity and safety for students at risk of food-related anaphylactic reactions. It also builds on existing statutes requiring schools to provide emergency medical aid for allergic reactions through the use of epinephrine auto-injectors.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding AB 2640 appears largely positive, with strong support echoed by proponents who laud its potential for safeguarding the health of children with food allergies. The bill has received bipartisan backing in the California legislature, reflecting a shared concern for student welfare. While the focus is primarily on health and inclusivity, some stakeholders may express apprehension regarding the responsibility placed on schools and educators to manage food allergies effectively and may question the adequacy of resources allocated for implementation.

Contention

One notable aspect of contention may arise from the practical application of the resource guide and the responsibilities of local educational agencies. While the bill encourages the consultation of the internet web page, concerns may exist regarding the extent to which schools can provide tailored support within their existing frameworks and resources. Education stakeholders might debate the effectiveness of the proposed measures and whether additional mandates are necessary to ensure student safety without overwhelming educational staff.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA AB2042

Child daycare facilities: anaphylactic policy.

CA AB2317

Child day care facilities: anaphylactic policy.

CA AB3064

Pupil health: food allergies: guidelines.

CT HB05452

An Act Concerning The Recommendations Of The Task Force On Life-threatening Food Allergies In Schools.

TX HB2555

Relating to guidelines for policies of school districts and open-enrollment charter schools for the care of certain students at risk for anaphylaxis.

TX SB869

Relating to guidelines for policies of school districts and open-enrollment charter schools for the care of certain students at risk for anaphylaxis.

CA AB1532

Food facilities: food safety: employee knowledge.

KS SB460

Requiring the secretary of health and environment to adopt anaphylaxis prevention and response policies for schools and day care facilities that set forth guidelines and procedures to prevent and respond to anaphylaxis.