California 2021-2022 Regular Session

California Assembly Bill AB2654

Introduced
2/18/22  
Introduced
2/18/22  
Refer
3/10/22  
Refer
3/10/22  
Report Pass
3/22/22  
Report Pass
3/22/22  
Refer
3/23/22  
Refer
3/23/22  
Report Pass
3/29/22  
Report Pass
3/29/22  
Refer
3/29/22  
Refer
3/29/22  
Report Pass
4/7/22  
Refer
4/18/22  
Refer
4/18/22  
Report Pass
4/27/22  
Report Pass
4/27/22  
Refer
4/27/22  
Refer
4/27/22  
Refer
5/11/22  

Caption

Gabriel’s Law.

Summary

Assembly Bill 2654, known as Gabriel's Law, seeks to improve accountability, coordination, and integration among state and local efforts in addressing fatal child abuse or neglect. It focuses on creating a comprehensive system to share data regarding child fatalities linked to abuse and neglect, aiming to enhance preventative measures. The bill removes funding limitations, ensuring the California State Child Death Review Council operates continuously and requires biannual reports on child fatality data, thereby improving the state's ability to track and analyze these cases effectively. The intent of the legislation is to ensure multiple state departments, including the Department of Justice, the California Health and Human Services Agency, and the State Department of Social Services, can collaborate to compile accurate information regarding child fatalities and their causes. By mandating the development of standardized definitions and protocols for investigating these cases, the bill emphasizes the necessity of structured data reporting across various state agencies, intending to create a comprehensive monitoring system. Supporters of AB 2654 assert that the bill will lead to significant advancements in child safety by enhancing the communication and cooperation between agencies responsible for child welfare. Proponents believe the improvements to data sharing and oversight will ultimately lead to better outcomes for vulnerable children who may be at risk of abuse or neglect. However, the bill has also faced scrutiny and pushback, primarily concerning concerns about data privacy and the implications of increased state oversight on local child welfare practices. Critics argue that while the intention behind the bill is laudable, it could lead to challenges in how local agencies balance their responsibilities with the additional state mandates. The discussion around HB 2654 highlighted key issues of governance, local autonomy, and the effectiveness of a centralized data approach in sensitive matters surrounding child safety.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA AB2660

Child death investigations: review teams.

CA AB253

Child death investigations: review teams.

CA AB538

Sexual assault: medical evidentiary examinations and reporting.

CA SB1094

Sexual assault: medical evidentiary examinations.

CA AB1929

Child abuse and neglect reporting.

CA AB1688

Community health services: California Mental Health Planning Council, California Children’s Services program, Alameda County pilot program, and Medi-Cal managed care.

CA SB906

Mental health services and substance use disorder treatment: peer support specialist certification.