| Old | New | Differences | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | - | ||
| 1 | + | Amended IN Senate August 11, 2022 Amended IN Senate June 20, 2022 Amended IN Assembly May 19, 2022 Amended IN Assembly March 24, 2022 CALIFORNIA LEGISLATURE 20212022 REGULAR SESSION Assembly Bill No. 2665Introduced by Assembly Member CarrilloFebruary 18, 2022An act to add and repeal Section 324.6 of the Welfare and Institutions Code, relating to child welfare services.LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL'S DIGESTAB 2665, as amended, Carrillo. Child welfare system: racial disparities.Existing law establishes the jurisdiction of the juvenile court, which may adjudge children to be dependents of the court under certain circumstances, including when the child suffered or there is a substantial risk that the child will suffer serious physical harm, or a parent fails to provide the child with adequate food, clothing, shelter, or medical treatment. Existing law establishes the grounds for removal of a dependent child from the custody of their parents or guardian, and establishes procedures to determine temporary placement of a dependent child. Existing law generally governs the provision of child welfare services, which is defined to mean public social services that are directed toward the accomplishment of specified purposes, including protecting and promoting the welfare of all children and preventing the unnecessary separation of children from their families.This bill would would, upon appropriation by the Legislature, require the State Department of Social Services to establish a 3-year pilot program on or before July 1, 2023, for the purpose of addressing racial disparities in the child welfare system in up to 5 counties, which shall be selected to participate on a voluntary basis in the pilot program according to criteria developed by the department. The bill would require the department to establish a working group to develop recommendations to the department regarding the development of procedures necessary to implement and evaluate the pilot program for each county. The bill would require a county that receives funding pursuant to these provisions to utilize a blind removal strategy when deciding whether a child should be removed from the physical custody of their parent or guardian, as specified. The bill would require the department to submit to the Legislature an evaluation of the pilot programs and their impact and effectiveness, as specified.Digest Key Vote: MAJORITY Appropriation: NO Fiscal Committee: YES Local Program: NO Bill TextThe people of the State of California do enact as follows:SECTION 1. It is the intent of the Legislature to promote racial equity and advance practices of equity and inclusion in the child welfare system. The Legislature finds and declares that families from racial and ethnic minority populations are disparately represented nationwide in the child welfare system. It is further the intent of the Legislature to address the racial disparities in the child welfare system by eliminating bias in the decisionmaking process determining whether children are removed from the physical custody of their parent or guardian by utilizing a blind removal strategy.SEC. 2. Section 324.6 is added to the Welfare and Institutions Code, to read:324.6. (a) (1) (A) On or before July 1, 2023, the State Department of Social Services shall shall, upon appropriation by the Legislature for the express purpose of this section, establish a three-year pilot program for participating counties for the purpose of addressing racial disparities in the child welfare system in up to five counties, which shall be selected to participate on a voluntary basis in the pilot program according to criteria developed by the department, in consultation with the County Welfare Directors Association of California, federally recognized tribes located in California, and the departments Tribal Advisory Committee. In selecting the pilot counties, the department shall promote diversity among the participating counties in terms of size and geographic location. The counties shall include, at a minimum, one county in southern California, one county in northern California, and one county in a rural area of the state.(B) The department may proceed with the pilot program if fewer than five counties volunteer for the program or the volunteer counties do not satisfy the geographic diversity provisions, provided the department determines there is adequate participation in the pilot program from the volunteering county or counties to produce useful data and results. If a county begins the pilot program and drops out before the program is complete, the department may continue the pilot program in the remaining counties.(2) The department shall, in consultation with county child welfare agencies, federally recognized tribes located in California, and other stakeholders, as appropriate, establish a working group to develop recommendations to the department regarding the development of procedures necessary to implement and evaluate the pilot programs for each county.(b) (1) A county that receives funding pursuant to this section shall utilize a blind removal strategy when deciding whether a child should be removed from the physical custody of their parent or guardian.(2) A county that receives funding pursuant to this section shall include, but shall not be limited to, a program whereby at any meeting of the county child welfare agency during which the removal of a child from the childs home is discussed, all of the following information shall be redacted from the case file in preparation for the removal decision and may not be referenced:(A) The name of the child and the childs parents.(B) The gender of the childs parents.(C) The race or ethnicity of the child and the childs parents.(D) The sexual orientation of the childs parents.(E) The address of the child and the childs parents.(F) The income of the childs parents.(3) All redacted identifying information shall be available for all other purposes throughout the local child welfare agencys involvement with the child, including, but not limited to, evaluations, provision of services, compliance with requirements pursuant to the federal Indian Child Welfare Act of 1978 (25 U.S.C. Sec. 1901 et seq.), and court proceedings.(4) The blind removal strategy shall not be used in any case involving the emergency removal of a child from the physical custody of their parent or guardian.(c) (1) County participation in the pilot program is voluntary.(2) A participating county may implement the pilot for all or a portion of its emergency response program. The county shall not be required to reimburse the state for any expenses incurred as a result of their early exit from the pilot program. The department may continue to implement the pilot program if less than five counties remain in the pilot program after its commencement.(3) Each county is encouraged, but not required, to take actions in addition to those specified in this section that support the goal of promoting racial equity and advancing practices of equity and inclusion in the child welfare system.(d) (1) The department shall conduct at least one evaluation of the participating counties pilot programs and their impact and effectiveness after 18 months of implementation and again after three years of implementation, and shall submit the information from the evaluation in a report to the Legislature within six months after those periods of implementation. The evaluation shall include, but not be limited to, monitoring the countys effect on the rate of Black, Native American, and Latinx children who were removed from their parents home.(2) A report to be submitted pursuant to paragraph (1) shall be submitted in compliance with Section 9795 of the Government Code.(e) For purposes of this section, blind removal strategy means redacting the demographic information described in paragraph (2) of subdivision (b) from the investigative report in order to eliminate implicit bias in the decisionmaking process of determining whether a child should be removed from the physical custody of their parent or guardian.(f) Nothing in this section, or in the implementation of the pilot program, shall exempt any county or private party from complying with all provisions of the federal Indian Child Welfare Act of 1978 (25 U.S.C. Sec. 1901 et seq.) or state laws implementing the federal Indian Child Welfare Act of 1978. (g) This section shall remain in effect only until January 1, 2027, and as of that date is repealed. | |
| 2 | 2 | ||
| 3 | - | ||
| 3 | + | Amended IN Senate August 11, 2022 Amended IN Senate June 20, 2022 Amended IN Assembly May 19, 2022 Amended IN Assembly March 24, 2022 CALIFORNIA LEGISLATURE 20212022 REGULAR SESSION Assembly Bill No. 2665Introduced by Assembly Member CarrilloFebruary 18, 2022An act to add and repeal Section 324.6 of the Welfare and Institutions Code, relating to child welfare services.LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL'S DIGESTAB 2665, as amended, Carrillo. Child welfare system: racial disparities.Existing law establishes the jurisdiction of the juvenile court, which may adjudge children to be dependents of the court under certain circumstances, including when the child suffered or there is a substantial risk that the child will suffer serious physical harm, or a parent fails to provide the child with adequate food, clothing, shelter, or medical treatment. Existing law establishes the grounds for removal of a dependent child from the custody of their parents or guardian, and establishes procedures to determine temporary placement of a dependent child. Existing law generally governs the provision of child welfare services, which is defined to mean public social services that are directed toward the accomplishment of specified purposes, including protecting and promoting the welfare of all children and preventing the unnecessary separation of children from their families.This bill would would, upon appropriation by the Legislature, require the State Department of Social Services to establish a 3-year pilot program on or before July 1, 2023, for the purpose of addressing racial disparities in the child welfare system in up to 5 counties, which shall be selected to participate on a voluntary basis in the pilot program according to criteria developed by the department. The bill would require the department to establish a working group to develop recommendations to the department regarding the development of procedures necessary to implement and evaluate the pilot program for each county. The bill would require a county that receives funding pursuant to these provisions to utilize a blind removal strategy when deciding whether a child should be removed from the physical custody of their parent or guardian, as specified. The bill would require the department to submit to the Legislature an evaluation of the pilot programs and their impact and effectiveness, as specified.Digest Key Vote: MAJORITY Appropriation: NO Fiscal Committee: YES Local Program: NO | |
| 4 | 4 | ||
| 5 | - | ||
| 5 | + | Amended IN Senate August 11, 2022 Amended IN Senate June 20, 2022 Amended IN Assembly May 19, 2022 Amended IN Assembly March 24, 2022 | |
| 6 | 6 | ||
| 7 | - | Enrolled August 26, 2022 | |
| 8 | - | Passed IN Senate August 23, 2022 | |
| 9 | - | Passed IN Assembly August 24, 2022 | |
| 10 | 7 | Amended IN Senate August 11, 2022 | |
| 11 | 8 | Amended IN Senate June 20, 2022 | |
| 12 | 9 | Amended IN Assembly May 19, 2022 | |
| 13 | 10 | Amended IN Assembly March 24, 2022 | |
| 14 | 11 | ||
| 15 | 12 | CALIFORNIA LEGISLATURE 20212022 REGULAR SESSION | |
| 16 | 13 | ||
| 17 | 14 | Assembly Bill | |
| 18 | 15 | ||
| 19 | 16 | No. 2665 | |
| 20 | 17 | ||
| 21 | 18 | Introduced by Assembly Member CarrilloFebruary 18, 2022 | |
| 22 | 19 | ||
| 23 | 20 | Introduced by Assembly Member Carrillo | |
| 24 | 21 | February 18, 2022 | |
| 25 | 22 | ||
| 26 | 23 | An act to add and repeal Section 324.6 of the Welfare and Institutions Code, relating to child welfare services. | |
| 27 | 24 | ||
| 28 | 25 | LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL'S DIGEST | |
| 29 | 26 | ||
| 30 | 27 | ## LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL'S DIGEST | |
| 31 | 28 | ||
| 32 | - | AB 2665, Carrillo. Child welfare system: racial disparities. | |
| 29 | + | AB 2665, as amended, Carrillo. Child welfare system: racial disparities. | |
| 33 | 30 | ||
| 34 | - | Existing law establishes the jurisdiction of the juvenile court, which may adjudge children to be dependents of the court under certain circumstances, including when the child suffered or there is a substantial risk that the child will suffer serious physical harm, or a parent fails to provide the child with adequate food, clothing, shelter, or medical treatment. Existing law establishes the grounds for removal of a dependent child from the custody of their parents or guardian, and establishes procedures to determine temporary placement of a dependent child. Existing law generally governs the provision of child welfare services, which is defined to mean public social services that are directed toward the accomplishment of specified purposes, including protecting and promoting the welfare of all children and preventing the unnecessary separation of children from their families.This bill would, upon appropriation by the Legislature, require the State Department of Social Services to establish a 3-year pilot program on or before July 1, 2023, for the purpose of addressing racial disparities in the child welfare system in up to 5 counties, which shall be selected to participate on a voluntary basis in the pilot program according to criteria developed by the department. The bill would require the department to establish a working group to develop recommendations to the department regarding the development of procedures necessary to implement and evaluate the pilot program for each county. The bill would require a county that receives funding pursuant to these provisions to utilize a blind removal strategy when deciding whether a child should be removed from the physical custody of their parent or guardian, as specified. The bill would require the department to submit to the Legislature an evaluation of the pilot programs and their impact and effectiveness, as specified. | |
| 31 | + | Existing law establishes the jurisdiction of the juvenile court, which may adjudge children to be dependents of the court under certain circumstances, including when the child suffered or there is a substantial risk that the child will suffer serious physical harm, or a parent fails to provide the child with adequate food, clothing, shelter, or medical treatment. Existing law establishes the grounds for removal of a dependent child from the custody of their parents or guardian, and establishes procedures to determine temporary placement of a dependent child. Existing law generally governs the provision of child welfare services, which is defined to mean public social services that are directed toward the accomplishment of specified purposes, including protecting and promoting the welfare of all children and preventing the unnecessary separation of children from their families.This bill would would, upon appropriation by the Legislature, require the State Department of Social Services to establish a 3-year pilot program on or before July 1, 2023, for the purpose of addressing racial disparities in the child welfare system in up to 5 counties, which shall be selected to participate on a voluntary basis in the pilot program according to criteria developed by the department. The bill would require the department to establish a working group to develop recommendations to the department regarding the development of procedures necessary to implement and evaluate the pilot program for each county. The bill would require a county that receives funding pursuant to these provisions to utilize a blind removal strategy when deciding whether a child should be removed from the physical custody of their parent or guardian, as specified. The bill would require the department to submit to the Legislature an evaluation of the pilot programs and their impact and effectiveness, as specified. | |
| 35 | 32 | ||
| 36 | 33 | Existing law establishes the jurisdiction of the juvenile court, which may adjudge children to be dependents of the court under certain circumstances, including when the child suffered or there is a substantial risk that the child will suffer serious physical harm, or a parent fails to provide the child with adequate food, clothing, shelter, or medical treatment. Existing law establishes the grounds for removal of a dependent child from the custody of their parents or guardian, and establishes procedures to determine temporary placement of a dependent child. Existing law generally governs the provision of child welfare services, which is defined to mean public social services that are directed toward the accomplishment of specified purposes, including protecting and promoting the welfare of all children and preventing the unnecessary separation of children from their families. | |
| 37 | 34 | ||
| 38 | - | This bill would, upon appropriation by the Legislature, require the State Department of Social Services to establish a 3-year pilot program on or before July 1, 2023, for the purpose of addressing racial disparities in the child welfare system in up to 5 counties, which shall be selected to participate on a voluntary basis in the pilot program according to criteria developed by the department. The bill would require the department to establish a working group to develop recommendations to the department regarding the development of procedures necessary to implement and evaluate the pilot program for each county. The bill would require a county that receives funding pursuant to these provisions to utilize a blind removal strategy when deciding whether a child should be removed from the physical custody of their parent or guardian, as specified. The bill would require the department to submit to the Legislature an evaluation of the pilot programs and their impact and effectiveness, as specified. | |
| 35 | + | This bill would would, upon appropriation by the Legislature, require the State Department of Social Services to establish a 3-year pilot program on or before July 1, 2023, for the purpose of addressing racial disparities in the child welfare system in up to 5 counties, which shall be selected to participate on a voluntary basis in the pilot program according to criteria developed by the department. The bill would require the department to establish a working group to develop recommendations to the department regarding the development of procedures necessary to implement and evaluate the pilot program for each county. The bill would require a county that receives funding pursuant to these provisions to utilize a blind removal strategy when deciding whether a child should be removed from the physical custody of their parent or guardian, as specified. The bill would require the department to submit to the Legislature an evaluation of the pilot programs and their impact and effectiveness, as specified. | |
| 39 | 36 | ||
| 40 | 37 | ## Digest Key | |
| 41 | 38 | ||
| 42 | 39 | ## Bill Text | |
| 43 | 40 | ||
| 44 | - | The people of the State of California do enact as follows:SECTION 1. It is the intent of the Legislature to promote racial equity and advance practices of equity and inclusion in the child welfare system. The Legislature finds and declares that families from racial and ethnic minority populations are disparately represented nationwide in the child welfare system. It is further the intent of the Legislature to address the racial disparities in the child welfare system by eliminating bias in the decisionmaking process determining whether children are removed from the physical custody of their parent or guardian by utilizing a blind removal strategy.SEC. 2. Section 324.6 is added to the Welfare and Institutions Code, to read:324.6. (a) (1) (A) On or before July 1, 2023, the State Department of Social Services shall, upon appropriation by the Legislature for the express purpose of this section, establish a three-year pilot program for participating counties for the purpose of addressing racial disparities in the child welfare system in up to five counties, which shall be selected to participate on a voluntary basis in the pilot program according to criteria developed by the department, in consultation with the County Welfare Directors Association of California, federally recognized tribes located in California, and the departments Tribal Advisory Committee. In selecting the pilot counties, the department shall promote diversity among the participating counties in terms of size and geographic location. The counties shall include, at a minimum, one county in southern California, one county in northern California, and one county in a rural area of the state.(B) The department may proceed with the pilot program if fewer than five counties volunteer for the program or the volunteer counties do not satisfy the geographic diversity provisions, provided the department determines there is adequate participation in the pilot program from the volunteering county or counties to produce useful data and results. If a county begins the pilot program and drops out before the program is complete, the department may continue the pilot program in the remaining counties.(2) The department shall, in consultation with county child welfare agencies, federally recognized tribes located in California, and other stakeholders, as appropriate, establish a working group to develop recommendations to the department regarding the development of procedures necessary to implement and evaluate the pilot programs for each county.(b) (1) A county that receives funding pursuant to this section shall utilize a blind removal strategy when deciding whether a child should be removed from the physical custody of their parent or guardian.(2) A county that receives funding pursuant to this section shall include, but shall not be limited to, a program whereby at any meeting of the county child welfare agency during which the removal of a child from the childs home is discussed, all of the following information shall be redacted from the case file in preparation for the removal decision and may not be referenced:(A) The name of the child and the childs parents.(B) The gender of the childs parents.(C) The race or ethnicity of the child and the childs parents.(D) The sexual orientation of the childs parents.(E) The address of the child and the childs parents.(F) The income of the childs parents.(3) All redacted identifying information shall be available for all other purposes throughout the local child welfare agencys involvement with the child, including, but not limited to, evaluations, provision of services, compliance with requirements pursuant to the federal Indian Child Welfare Act of 1978 (25 U.S.C. Sec. 1901 et seq.), and court proceedings.(4) The blind removal strategy shall not be used in any case involving the emergency removal of a child from the physical custody of their parent or guardian.(c) (1) County participation in the pilot program is voluntary.(2) A participating county may implement the pilot for all or a portion of its emergency response program. The county shall not be required to reimburse the state for any expenses incurred as a result of their early exit from the pilot program. The department may continue to implement the pilot program if less than five counties remain in the pilot program after its commencement.(3) Each county is encouraged, but not required, to take actions in addition to those specified in this section that support the goal of promoting racial equity and advancing practices of equity and inclusion in the child welfare system.(d) (1) The department shall conduct at least one evaluation of the participating counties pilot programs and their impact and effectiveness after 18 months of implementation and again after three years of implementation, and shall submit the information from the evaluation in a report to the Legislature within six months after those periods of implementation. The evaluation shall include, but not be limited to, monitoring the countys effect on the rate of Black, Native American, and Latinx children who were removed from their parents home.(2) A report to be submitted pursuant to paragraph (1) shall be submitted in compliance with Section 9795 of the Government Code.(e) For purposes of this section, blind removal strategy means redacting the demographic information described in paragraph (2) of subdivision (b) from the investigative report in order to eliminate implicit bias in the decisionmaking process of determining whether a child should be removed from the physical custody of their parent or guardian.(f) Nothing in this section, or in the implementation of the pilot program, shall exempt any county or private party from complying with all provisions of the federal Indian Child Welfare Act of 1978 (25 U.S.C. Sec. 1901 et seq.) or state laws implementing the federal Indian Child Welfare Act of 1978. (g) This section shall remain in effect only until January 1, 2027, and as of that date is repealed. | |
| 41 | + | The people of the State of California do enact as follows:SECTION 1. It is the intent of the Legislature to promote racial equity and advance practices of equity and inclusion in the child welfare system. The Legislature finds and declares that families from racial and ethnic minority populations are disparately represented nationwide in the child welfare system. It is further the intent of the Legislature to address the racial disparities in the child welfare system by eliminating bias in the decisionmaking process determining whether children are removed from the physical custody of their parent or guardian by utilizing a blind removal strategy.SEC. 2. Section 324.6 is added to the Welfare and Institutions Code, to read:324.6. (a) (1) (A) On or before July 1, 2023, the State Department of Social Services shall shall, upon appropriation by the Legislature for the express purpose of this section, establish a three-year pilot program for participating counties for the purpose of addressing racial disparities in the child welfare system in up to five counties, which shall be selected to participate on a voluntary basis in the pilot program according to criteria developed by the department, in consultation with the County Welfare Directors Association of California, federally recognized tribes located in California, and the departments Tribal Advisory Committee. In selecting the pilot counties, the department shall promote diversity among the participating counties in terms of size and geographic location. The counties shall include, at a minimum, one county in southern California, one county in northern California, and one county in a rural area of the state.(B) The department may proceed with the pilot program if fewer than five counties volunteer for the program or the volunteer counties do not satisfy the geographic diversity provisions, provided the department determines there is adequate participation in the pilot program from the volunteering county or counties to produce useful data and results. If a county begins the pilot program and drops out before the program is complete, the department may continue the pilot program in the remaining counties.(2) The department shall, in consultation with county child welfare agencies, federally recognized tribes located in California, and other stakeholders, as appropriate, establish a working group to develop recommendations to the department regarding the development of procedures necessary to implement and evaluate the pilot programs for each county.(b) (1) A county that receives funding pursuant to this section shall utilize a blind removal strategy when deciding whether a child should be removed from the physical custody of their parent or guardian.(2) A county that receives funding pursuant to this section shall include, but shall not be limited to, a program whereby at any meeting of the county child welfare agency during which the removal of a child from the childs home is discussed, all of the following information shall be redacted from the case file in preparation for the removal decision and may not be referenced:(A) The name of the child and the childs parents.(B) The gender of the childs parents.(C) The race or ethnicity of the child and the childs parents.(D) The sexual orientation of the childs parents.(E) The address of the child and the childs parents.(F) The income of the childs parents.(3) All redacted identifying information shall be available for all other purposes throughout the local child welfare agencys involvement with the child, including, but not limited to, evaluations, provision of services, compliance with requirements pursuant to the federal Indian Child Welfare Act of 1978 (25 U.S.C. Sec. 1901 et seq.), and court proceedings.(4) The blind removal strategy shall not be used in any case involving the emergency removal of a child from the physical custody of their parent or guardian.(c) (1) County participation in the pilot program is voluntary.(2) A participating county may implement the pilot for all or a portion of its emergency response program. The county shall not be required to reimburse the state for any expenses incurred as a result of their early exit from the pilot program. The department may continue to implement the pilot program if less than five counties remain in the pilot program after its commencement.(3) Each county is encouraged, but not required, to take actions in addition to those specified in this section that support the goal of promoting racial equity and advancing practices of equity and inclusion in the child welfare system.(d) (1) The department shall conduct at least one evaluation of the participating counties pilot programs and their impact and effectiveness after 18 months of implementation and again after three years of implementation, and shall submit the information from the evaluation in a report to the Legislature within six months after those periods of implementation. The evaluation shall include, but not be limited to, monitoring the countys effect on the rate of Black, Native American, and Latinx children who were removed from their parents home.(2) A report to be submitted pursuant to paragraph (1) shall be submitted in compliance with Section 9795 of the Government Code.(e) For purposes of this section, blind removal strategy means redacting the demographic information described in paragraph (2) of subdivision (b) from the investigative report in order to eliminate implicit bias in the decisionmaking process of determining whether a child should be removed from the physical custody of their parent or guardian.(f) Nothing in this section, or in the implementation of the pilot program, shall exempt any county or private party from complying with all provisions of the federal Indian Child Welfare Act of 1978 (25 U.S.C. Sec. 1901 et seq.) or state laws implementing the federal Indian Child Welfare Act of 1978. (g) This section shall remain in effect only until January 1, 2027, and as of that date is repealed. | |
| 45 | 42 | ||
| 46 | 43 | The people of the State of California do enact as follows: | |
| 47 | 44 | ||
| 48 | 45 | ## The people of the State of California do enact as follows: | |
| 49 | 46 | ||
| 50 | 47 | SECTION 1. It is the intent of the Legislature to promote racial equity and advance practices of equity and inclusion in the child welfare system. The Legislature finds and declares that families from racial and ethnic minority populations are disparately represented nationwide in the child welfare system. It is further the intent of the Legislature to address the racial disparities in the child welfare system by eliminating bias in the decisionmaking process determining whether children are removed from the physical custody of their parent or guardian by utilizing a blind removal strategy. | |
| 51 | 48 | ||
| 52 | 49 | SECTION 1. It is the intent of the Legislature to promote racial equity and advance practices of equity and inclusion in the child welfare system. The Legislature finds and declares that families from racial and ethnic minority populations are disparately represented nationwide in the child welfare system. It is further the intent of the Legislature to address the racial disparities in the child welfare system by eliminating bias in the decisionmaking process determining whether children are removed from the physical custody of their parent or guardian by utilizing a blind removal strategy. | |
| 53 | 50 | ||
| 54 | 51 | SECTION 1. It is the intent of the Legislature to promote racial equity and advance practices of equity and inclusion in the child welfare system. The Legislature finds and declares that families from racial and ethnic minority populations are disparately represented nationwide in the child welfare system. It is further the intent of the Legislature to address the racial disparities in the child welfare system by eliminating bias in the decisionmaking process determining whether children are removed from the physical custody of their parent or guardian by utilizing a blind removal strategy. | |
| 55 | 52 | ||
| 56 | 53 | ### SECTION 1. | |
| 57 | 54 | ||
| 58 | - | SEC. 2. Section 324.6 is added to the Welfare and Institutions Code, to read:324.6. (a) (1) (A) On or before July 1, 2023, the State Department of Social Services shall, upon appropriation by the Legislature for the express purpose of this section, establish a three-year pilot program for participating counties for the purpose of addressing racial disparities in the child welfare system in up to five counties, which shall be selected to participate on a voluntary basis in the pilot program according to criteria developed by the department, in consultation with the County Welfare Directors Association of California, federally recognized tribes located in California, and the departments Tribal Advisory Committee. In selecting the pilot counties, the department shall promote diversity among the participating counties in terms of size and geographic location. The counties shall include, at a minimum, one county in southern California, one county in northern California, and one county in a rural area of the state.(B) The department may proceed with the pilot program if fewer than five counties volunteer for the program or the volunteer counties do not satisfy the geographic diversity provisions, provided the department determines there is adequate participation in the pilot program from the volunteering county or counties to produce useful data and results. If a county begins the pilot program and drops out before the program is complete, the department may continue the pilot program in the remaining counties.(2) The department shall, in consultation with county child welfare agencies, federally recognized tribes located in California, and other stakeholders, as appropriate, establish a working group to develop recommendations to the department regarding the development of procedures necessary to implement and evaluate the pilot programs for each county.(b) (1) A county that receives funding pursuant to this section shall utilize a blind removal strategy when deciding whether a child should be removed from the physical custody of their parent or guardian.(2) A county that receives funding pursuant to this section shall include, but shall not be limited to, a program whereby at any meeting of the county child welfare agency during which the removal of a child from the childs home is discussed, all of the following information shall be redacted from the case file in preparation for the removal decision and may not be referenced:(A) The name of the child and the childs parents.(B) The gender of the childs parents.(C) The race or ethnicity of the child and the childs parents.(D) The sexual orientation of the childs parents.(E) The address of the child and the childs parents.(F) The income of the childs parents.(3) All redacted identifying information shall be available for all other purposes throughout the local child welfare agencys involvement with the child, including, but not limited to, evaluations, provision of services, compliance with requirements pursuant to the federal Indian Child Welfare Act of 1978 (25 U.S.C. Sec. 1901 et seq.), and court proceedings.(4) The blind removal strategy shall not be used in any case involving the emergency removal of a child from the physical custody of their parent or guardian.(c) (1) County participation in the pilot program is voluntary.(2) A participating county may implement the pilot for all or a portion of its emergency response program. The county shall not be required to reimburse the state for any expenses incurred as a result of their early exit from the pilot program. The department may continue to implement the pilot program if less than five counties remain in the pilot program after its commencement.(3) Each county is encouraged, but not required, to take actions in addition to those specified in this section that support the goal of promoting racial equity and advancing practices of equity and inclusion in the child welfare system.(d) (1) The department shall conduct at least one evaluation of the participating counties pilot programs and their impact and effectiveness after 18 months of implementation and again after three years of implementation, and shall submit the information from the evaluation in a report to the Legislature within six months after those periods of implementation. The evaluation shall include, but not be limited to, monitoring the countys effect on the rate of Black, Native American, and Latinx children who were removed from their parents home.(2) A report to be submitted pursuant to paragraph (1) shall be submitted in compliance with Section 9795 of the Government Code.(e) For purposes of this section, blind removal strategy means redacting the demographic information described in paragraph (2) of subdivision (b) from the investigative report in order to eliminate implicit bias in the decisionmaking process of determining whether a child should be removed from the physical custody of their parent or guardian.(f) Nothing in this section, or in the implementation of the pilot program, shall exempt any county or private party from complying with all provisions of the federal Indian Child Welfare Act of 1978 (25 U.S.C. Sec. 1901 et seq.) or state laws implementing the federal Indian Child Welfare Act of 1978. (g) This section shall remain in effect only until January 1, 2027, and as of that date is repealed. | |
| 55 | + | SEC. 2. Section 324.6 is added to the Welfare and Institutions Code, to read:324.6. (a) (1) (A) On or before July 1, 2023, the State Department of Social Services shall shall, upon appropriation by the Legislature for the express purpose of this section, establish a three-year pilot program for participating counties for the purpose of addressing racial disparities in the child welfare system in up to five counties, which shall be selected to participate on a voluntary basis in the pilot program according to criteria developed by the department, in consultation with the County Welfare Directors Association of California, federally recognized tribes located in California, and the departments Tribal Advisory Committee. In selecting the pilot counties, the department shall promote diversity among the participating counties in terms of size and geographic location. The counties shall include, at a minimum, one county in southern California, one county in northern California, and one county in a rural area of the state.(B) The department may proceed with the pilot program if fewer than five counties volunteer for the program or the volunteer counties do not satisfy the geographic diversity provisions, provided the department determines there is adequate participation in the pilot program from the volunteering county or counties to produce useful data and results. If a county begins the pilot program and drops out before the program is complete, the department may continue the pilot program in the remaining counties.(2) The department shall, in consultation with county child welfare agencies, federally recognized tribes located in California, and other stakeholders, as appropriate, establish a working group to develop recommendations to the department regarding the development of procedures necessary to implement and evaluate the pilot programs for each county.(b) (1) A county that receives funding pursuant to this section shall utilize a blind removal strategy when deciding whether a child should be removed from the physical custody of their parent or guardian.(2) A county that receives funding pursuant to this section shall include, but shall not be limited to, a program whereby at any meeting of the county child welfare agency during which the removal of a child from the childs home is discussed, all of the following information shall be redacted from the case file in preparation for the removal decision and may not be referenced:(A) The name of the child and the childs parents.(B) The gender of the childs parents.(C) The race or ethnicity of the child and the childs parents.(D) The sexual orientation of the childs parents.(E) The address of the child and the childs parents.(F) The income of the childs parents.(3) All redacted identifying information shall be available for all other purposes throughout the local child welfare agencys involvement with the child, including, but not limited to, evaluations, provision of services, compliance with requirements pursuant to the federal Indian Child Welfare Act of 1978 (25 U.S.C. Sec. 1901 et seq.), and court proceedings.(4) The blind removal strategy shall not be used in any case involving the emergency removal of a child from the physical custody of their parent or guardian.(c) (1) County participation in the pilot program is voluntary.(2) A participating county may implement the pilot for all or a portion of its emergency response program. The county shall not be required to reimburse the state for any expenses incurred as a result of their early exit from the pilot program. The department may continue to implement the pilot program if less than five counties remain in the pilot program after its commencement.(3) Each county is encouraged, but not required, to take actions in addition to those specified in this section that support the goal of promoting racial equity and advancing practices of equity and inclusion in the child welfare system.(d) (1) The department shall conduct at least one evaluation of the participating counties pilot programs and their impact and effectiveness after 18 months of implementation and again after three years of implementation, and shall submit the information from the evaluation in a report to the Legislature within six months after those periods of implementation. The evaluation shall include, but not be limited to, monitoring the countys effect on the rate of Black, Native American, and Latinx children who were removed from their parents home.(2) A report to be submitted pursuant to paragraph (1) shall be submitted in compliance with Section 9795 of the Government Code.(e) For purposes of this section, blind removal strategy means redacting the demographic information described in paragraph (2) of subdivision (b) from the investigative report in order to eliminate implicit bias in the decisionmaking process of determining whether a child should be removed from the physical custody of their parent or guardian.(f) Nothing in this section, or in the implementation of the pilot program, shall exempt any county or private party from complying with all provisions of the federal Indian Child Welfare Act of 1978 (25 U.S.C. Sec. 1901 et seq.) or state laws implementing the federal Indian Child Welfare Act of 1978. (g) This section shall remain in effect only until January 1, 2027, and as of that date is repealed. | |
| 59 | 56 | ||
| 60 | 57 | SEC. 2. Section 324.6 is added to the Welfare and Institutions Code, to read: | |
| 61 | 58 | ||
| 62 | 59 | ### SEC. 2. | |
| 63 | 60 | ||
| 64 | - | 324.6. (a) (1) (A) On or before July 1, 2023, the State Department of Social Services shall, upon appropriation by the Legislature for the express purpose of this section, establish a three-year pilot program for participating counties for the purpose of addressing racial disparities in the child welfare system in up to five counties, which shall be selected to participate on a voluntary basis in the pilot program according to criteria developed by the department, in consultation with the County Welfare Directors Association of California, federally recognized tribes located in California, and the departments Tribal Advisory Committee. In selecting the pilot counties, the department shall promote diversity among the participating counties in terms of size and geographic location. The counties shall include, at a minimum, one county in southern California, one county in northern California, and one county in a rural area of the state.(B) The department may proceed with the pilot program if fewer than five counties volunteer for the program or the volunteer counties do not satisfy the geographic diversity provisions, provided the department determines there is adequate participation in the pilot program from the volunteering county or counties to produce useful data and results. If a county begins the pilot program and drops out before the program is complete, the department may continue the pilot program in the remaining counties.(2) The department shall, in consultation with county child welfare agencies, federally recognized tribes located in California, and other stakeholders, as appropriate, establish a working group to develop recommendations to the department regarding the development of procedures necessary to implement and evaluate the pilot programs for each county.(b) (1) A county that receives funding pursuant to this section shall utilize a blind removal strategy when deciding whether a child should be removed from the physical custody of their parent or guardian.(2) A county that receives funding pursuant to this section shall include, but shall not be limited to, a program whereby at any meeting of the county child welfare agency during which the removal of a child from the childs home is discussed, all of the following information shall be redacted from the case file in preparation for the removal decision and may not be referenced:(A) The name of the child and the childs parents.(B) The gender of the childs parents.(C) The race or ethnicity of the child and the childs parents.(D) The sexual orientation of the childs parents.(E) The address of the child and the childs parents.(F) The income of the childs parents.(3) All redacted identifying information shall be available for all other purposes throughout the local child welfare agencys involvement with the child, including, but not limited to, evaluations, provision of services, compliance with requirements pursuant to the federal Indian Child Welfare Act of 1978 (25 U.S.C. Sec. 1901 et seq.), and court proceedings.(4) The blind removal strategy shall not be used in any case involving the emergency removal of a child from the physical custody of their parent or guardian.(c) (1) County participation in the pilot program is voluntary.(2) A participating county may implement the pilot for all or a portion of its emergency response program. The county shall not be required to reimburse the state for any expenses incurred as a result of their early exit from the pilot program. The department may continue to implement the pilot program if less than five counties remain in the pilot program after its commencement.(3) Each county is encouraged, but not required, to take actions in addition to those specified in this section that support the goal of promoting racial equity and advancing practices of equity and inclusion in the child welfare system.(d) (1) The department shall conduct at least one evaluation of the participating counties pilot programs and their impact and effectiveness after 18 months of implementation and again after three years of implementation, and shall submit the information from the evaluation in a report to the Legislature within six months after those periods of implementation. The evaluation shall include, but not be limited to, monitoring the countys effect on the rate of Black, Native American, and Latinx children who were removed from their parents home.(2) A report to be submitted pursuant to paragraph (1) shall be submitted in compliance with Section 9795 of the Government Code.(e) For purposes of this section, blind removal strategy means redacting the demographic information described in paragraph (2) of subdivision (b) from the investigative report in order to eliminate implicit bias in the decisionmaking process of determining whether a child should be removed from the physical custody of their parent or guardian.(f) Nothing in this section, or in the implementation of the pilot program, shall exempt any county or private party from complying with all provisions of the federal Indian Child Welfare Act of 1978 (25 U.S.C. Sec. 1901 et seq.) or state laws implementing the federal Indian Child Welfare Act of 1978. (g) This section shall remain in effect only until January 1, 2027, and as of that date is repealed. | |
| 61 | + | 324.6. (a) (1) (A) On or before July 1, 2023, the State Department of Social Services shall shall, upon appropriation by the Legislature for the express purpose of this section, establish a three-year pilot program for participating counties for the purpose of addressing racial disparities in the child welfare system in up to five counties, which shall be selected to participate on a voluntary basis in the pilot program according to criteria developed by the department, in consultation with the County Welfare Directors Association of California, federally recognized tribes located in California, and the departments Tribal Advisory Committee. In selecting the pilot counties, the department shall promote diversity among the participating counties in terms of size and geographic location. The counties shall include, at a minimum, one county in southern California, one county in northern California, and one county in a rural area of the state.(B) The department may proceed with the pilot program if fewer than five counties volunteer for the program or the volunteer counties do not satisfy the geographic diversity provisions, provided the department determines there is adequate participation in the pilot program from the volunteering county or counties to produce useful data and results. If a county begins the pilot program and drops out before the program is complete, the department may continue the pilot program in the remaining counties.(2) The department shall, in consultation with county child welfare agencies, federally recognized tribes located in California, and other stakeholders, as appropriate, establish a working group to develop recommendations to the department regarding the development of procedures necessary to implement and evaluate the pilot programs for each county.(b) (1) A county that receives funding pursuant to this section shall utilize a blind removal strategy when deciding whether a child should be removed from the physical custody of their parent or guardian.(2) A county that receives funding pursuant to this section shall include, but shall not be limited to, a program whereby at any meeting of the county child welfare agency during which the removal of a child from the childs home is discussed, all of the following information shall be redacted from the case file in preparation for the removal decision and may not be referenced:(A) The name of the child and the childs parents.(B) The gender of the childs parents.(C) The race or ethnicity of the child and the childs parents.(D) The sexual orientation of the childs parents.(E) The address of the child and the childs parents.(F) The income of the childs parents.(3) All redacted identifying information shall be available for all other purposes throughout the local child welfare agencys involvement with the child, including, but not limited to, evaluations, provision of services, compliance with requirements pursuant to the federal Indian Child Welfare Act of 1978 (25 U.S.C. Sec. 1901 et seq.), and court proceedings.(4) The blind removal strategy shall not be used in any case involving the emergency removal of a child from the physical custody of their parent or guardian.(c) (1) County participation in the pilot program is voluntary.(2) A participating county may implement the pilot for all or a portion of its emergency response program. The county shall not be required to reimburse the state for any expenses incurred as a result of their early exit from the pilot program. The department may continue to implement the pilot program if less than five counties remain in the pilot program after its commencement.(3) Each county is encouraged, but not required, to take actions in addition to those specified in this section that support the goal of promoting racial equity and advancing practices of equity and inclusion in the child welfare system.(d) (1) The department shall conduct at least one evaluation of the participating counties pilot programs and their impact and effectiveness after 18 months of implementation and again after three years of implementation, and shall submit the information from the evaluation in a report to the Legislature within six months after those periods of implementation. The evaluation shall include, but not be limited to, monitoring the countys effect on the rate of Black, Native American, and Latinx children who were removed from their parents home.(2) A report to be submitted pursuant to paragraph (1) shall be submitted in compliance with Section 9795 of the Government Code.(e) For purposes of this section, blind removal strategy means redacting the demographic information described in paragraph (2) of subdivision (b) from the investigative report in order to eliminate implicit bias in the decisionmaking process of determining whether a child should be removed from the physical custody of their parent or guardian.(f) Nothing in this section, or in the implementation of the pilot program, shall exempt any county or private party from complying with all provisions of the federal Indian Child Welfare Act of 1978 (25 U.S.C. Sec. 1901 et seq.) or state laws implementing the federal Indian Child Welfare Act of 1978. (g) This section shall remain in effect only until January 1, 2027, and as of that date is repealed. | |
| 65 | 62 | ||
| 66 | - | 324.6. (a) (1) (A) On or before July 1, 2023, the State Department of Social Services shall, upon appropriation by the Legislature for the express purpose of this section, establish a three-year pilot program for participating counties for the purpose of addressing racial disparities in the child welfare system in up to five counties, which shall be selected to participate on a voluntary basis in the pilot program according to criteria developed by the department, in consultation with the County Welfare Directors Association of California, federally recognized tribes located in California, and the departments Tribal Advisory Committee. In selecting the pilot counties, the department shall promote diversity among the participating counties in terms of size and geographic location. The counties shall include, at a minimum, one county in southern California, one county in northern California, and one county in a rural area of the state.(B) The department may proceed with the pilot program if fewer than five counties volunteer for the program or the volunteer counties do not satisfy the geographic diversity provisions, provided the department determines there is adequate participation in the pilot program from the volunteering county or counties to produce useful data and results. If a county begins the pilot program and drops out before the program is complete, the department may continue the pilot program in the remaining counties.(2) The department shall, in consultation with county child welfare agencies, federally recognized tribes located in California, and other stakeholders, as appropriate, establish a working group to develop recommendations to the department regarding the development of procedures necessary to implement and evaluate the pilot programs for each county.(b) (1) A county that receives funding pursuant to this section shall utilize a blind removal strategy when deciding whether a child should be removed from the physical custody of their parent or guardian.(2) A county that receives funding pursuant to this section shall include, but shall not be limited to, a program whereby at any meeting of the county child welfare agency during which the removal of a child from the childs home is discussed, all of the following information shall be redacted from the case file in preparation for the removal decision and may not be referenced:(A) The name of the child and the childs parents.(B) The gender of the childs parents.(C) The race or ethnicity of the child and the childs parents.(D) The sexual orientation of the childs parents.(E) The address of the child and the childs parents.(F) The income of the childs parents.(3) All redacted identifying information shall be available for all other purposes throughout the local child welfare agencys involvement with the child, including, but not limited to, evaluations, provision of services, compliance with requirements pursuant to the federal Indian Child Welfare Act of 1978 (25 U.S.C. Sec. 1901 et seq.), and court proceedings.(4) The blind removal strategy shall not be used in any case involving the emergency removal of a child from the physical custody of their parent or guardian.(c) (1) County participation in the pilot program is voluntary.(2) A participating county may implement the pilot for all or a portion of its emergency response program. The county shall not be required to reimburse the state for any expenses incurred as a result of their early exit from the pilot program. The department may continue to implement the pilot program if less than five counties remain in the pilot program after its commencement.(3) Each county is encouraged, but not required, to take actions in addition to those specified in this section that support the goal of promoting racial equity and advancing practices of equity and inclusion in the child welfare system.(d) (1) The department shall conduct at least one evaluation of the participating counties pilot programs and their impact and effectiveness after 18 months of implementation and again after three years of implementation, and shall submit the information from the evaluation in a report to the Legislature within six months after those periods of implementation. The evaluation shall include, but not be limited to, monitoring the countys effect on the rate of Black, Native American, and Latinx children who were removed from their parents home.(2) A report to be submitted pursuant to paragraph (1) shall be submitted in compliance with Section 9795 of the Government Code.(e) For purposes of this section, blind removal strategy means redacting the demographic information described in paragraph (2) of subdivision (b) from the investigative report in order to eliminate implicit bias in the decisionmaking process of determining whether a child should be removed from the physical custody of their parent or guardian.(f) Nothing in this section, or in the implementation of the pilot program, shall exempt any county or private party from complying with all provisions of the federal Indian Child Welfare Act of 1978 (25 U.S.C. Sec. 1901 et seq.) or state laws implementing the federal Indian Child Welfare Act of 1978. (g) This section shall remain in effect only until January 1, 2027, and as of that date is repealed. | |
| 63 | + | 324.6. (a) (1) (A) On or before July 1, 2023, the State Department of Social Services shall shall, upon appropriation by the Legislature for the express purpose of this section, establish a three-year pilot program for participating counties for the purpose of addressing racial disparities in the child welfare system in up to five counties, which shall be selected to participate on a voluntary basis in the pilot program according to criteria developed by the department, in consultation with the County Welfare Directors Association of California, federally recognized tribes located in California, and the departments Tribal Advisory Committee. In selecting the pilot counties, the department shall promote diversity among the participating counties in terms of size and geographic location. The counties shall include, at a minimum, one county in southern California, one county in northern California, and one county in a rural area of the state.(B) The department may proceed with the pilot program if fewer than five counties volunteer for the program or the volunteer counties do not satisfy the geographic diversity provisions, provided the department determines there is adequate participation in the pilot program from the volunteering county or counties to produce useful data and results. If a county begins the pilot program and drops out before the program is complete, the department may continue the pilot program in the remaining counties.(2) The department shall, in consultation with county child welfare agencies, federally recognized tribes located in California, and other stakeholders, as appropriate, establish a working group to develop recommendations to the department regarding the development of procedures necessary to implement and evaluate the pilot programs for each county.(b) (1) A county that receives funding pursuant to this section shall utilize a blind removal strategy when deciding whether a child should be removed from the physical custody of their parent or guardian.(2) A county that receives funding pursuant to this section shall include, but shall not be limited to, a program whereby at any meeting of the county child welfare agency during which the removal of a child from the childs home is discussed, all of the following information shall be redacted from the case file in preparation for the removal decision and may not be referenced:(A) The name of the child and the childs parents.(B) The gender of the childs parents.(C) The race or ethnicity of the child and the childs parents.(D) The sexual orientation of the childs parents.(E) The address of the child and the childs parents.(F) The income of the childs parents.(3) All redacted identifying information shall be available for all other purposes throughout the local child welfare agencys involvement with the child, including, but not limited to, evaluations, provision of services, compliance with requirements pursuant to the federal Indian Child Welfare Act of 1978 (25 U.S.C. Sec. 1901 et seq.), and court proceedings.(4) The blind removal strategy shall not be used in any case involving the emergency removal of a child from the physical custody of their parent or guardian.(c) (1) County participation in the pilot program is voluntary.(2) A participating county may implement the pilot for all or a portion of its emergency response program. The county shall not be required to reimburse the state for any expenses incurred as a result of their early exit from the pilot program. The department may continue to implement the pilot program if less than five counties remain in the pilot program after its commencement.(3) Each county is encouraged, but not required, to take actions in addition to those specified in this section that support the goal of promoting racial equity and advancing practices of equity and inclusion in the child welfare system.(d) (1) The department shall conduct at least one evaluation of the participating counties pilot programs and their impact and effectiveness after 18 months of implementation and again after three years of implementation, and shall submit the information from the evaluation in a report to the Legislature within six months after those periods of implementation. The evaluation shall include, but not be limited to, monitoring the countys effect on the rate of Black, Native American, and Latinx children who were removed from their parents home.(2) A report to be submitted pursuant to paragraph (1) shall be submitted in compliance with Section 9795 of the Government Code.(e) For purposes of this section, blind removal strategy means redacting the demographic information described in paragraph (2) of subdivision (b) from the investigative report in order to eliminate implicit bias in the decisionmaking process of determining whether a child should be removed from the physical custody of their parent or guardian.(f) Nothing in this section, or in the implementation of the pilot program, shall exempt any county or private party from complying with all provisions of the federal Indian Child Welfare Act of 1978 (25 U.S.C. Sec. 1901 et seq.) or state laws implementing the federal Indian Child Welfare Act of 1978. (g) This section shall remain in effect only until January 1, 2027, and as of that date is repealed. | |
| 67 | 64 | ||
| 68 | - | 324.6. (a) (1) (A) On or before July 1, 2023, the State Department of Social Services shall, upon appropriation by the Legislature for the express purpose of this section, establish a three-year pilot program for participating counties for the purpose of addressing racial disparities in the child welfare system in up to five counties, which shall be selected to participate on a voluntary basis in the pilot program according to criteria developed by the department, in consultation with the County Welfare Directors Association of California, federally recognized tribes located in California, and the departments Tribal Advisory Committee. In selecting the pilot counties, the department shall promote diversity among the participating counties in terms of size and geographic location. The counties shall include, at a minimum, one county in southern California, one county in northern California, and one county in a rural area of the state.(B) The department may proceed with the pilot program if fewer than five counties volunteer for the program or the volunteer counties do not satisfy the geographic diversity provisions, provided the department determines there is adequate participation in the pilot program from the volunteering county or counties to produce useful data and results. If a county begins the pilot program and drops out before the program is complete, the department may continue the pilot program in the remaining counties.(2) The department shall, in consultation with county child welfare agencies, federally recognized tribes located in California, and other stakeholders, as appropriate, establish a working group to develop recommendations to the department regarding the development of procedures necessary to implement and evaluate the pilot programs for each county.(b) (1) A county that receives funding pursuant to this section shall utilize a blind removal strategy when deciding whether a child should be removed from the physical custody of their parent or guardian.(2) A county that receives funding pursuant to this section shall include, but shall not be limited to, a program whereby at any meeting of the county child welfare agency during which the removal of a child from the childs home is discussed, all of the following information shall be redacted from the case file in preparation for the removal decision and may not be referenced:(A) The name of the child and the childs parents.(B) The gender of the childs parents.(C) The race or ethnicity of the child and the childs parents.(D) The sexual orientation of the childs parents.(E) The address of the child and the childs parents.(F) The income of the childs parents.(3) All redacted identifying information shall be available for all other purposes throughout the local child welfare agencys involvement with the child, including, but not limited to, evaluations, provision of services, compliance with requirements pursuant to the federal Indian Child Welfare Act of 1978 (25 U.S.C. Sec. 1901 et seq.), and court proceedings.(4) The blind removal strategy shall not be used in any case involving the emergency removal of a child from the physical custody of their parent or guardian.(c) (1) County participation in the pilot program is voluntary.(2) A participating county may implement the pilot for all or a portion of its emergency response program. The county shall not be required to reimburse the state for any expenses incurred as a result of their early exit from the pilot program. The department may continue to implement the pilot program if less than five counties remain in the pilot program after its commencement.(3) Each county is encouraged, but not required, to take actions in addition to those specified in this section that support the goal of promoting racial equity and advancing practices of equity and inclusion in the child welfare system.(d) (1) The department shall conduct at least one evaluation of the participating counties pilot programs and their impact and effectiveness after 18 months of implementation and again after three years of implementation, and shall submit the information from the evaluation in a report to the Legislature within six months after those periods of implementation. The evaluation shall include, but not be limited to, monitoring the countys effect on the rate of Black, Native American, and Latinx children who were removed from their parents home.(2) A report to be submitted pursuant to paragraph (1) shall be submitted in compliance with Section 9795 of the Government Code.(e) For purposes of this section, blind removal strategy means redacting the demographic information described in paragraph (2) of subdivision (b) from the investigative report in order to eliminate implicit bias in the decisionmaking process of determining whether a child should be removed from the physical custody of their parent or guardian.(f) Nothing in this section, or in the implementation of the pilot program, shall exempt any county or private party from complying with all provisions of the federal Indian Child Welfare Act of 1978 (25 U.S.C. Sec. 1901 et seq.) or state laws implementing the federal Indian Child Welfare Act of 1978. (g) This section shall remain in effect only until January 1, 2027, and as of that date is repealed. | |
| 65 | + | 324.6. (a) (1) (A) On or before July 1, 2023, the State Department of Social Services shall shall, upon appropriation by the Legislature for the express purpose of this section, establish a three-year pilot program for participating counties for the purpose of addressing racial disparities in the child welfare system in up to five counties, which shall be selected to participate on a voluntary basis in the pilot program according to criteria developed by the department, in consultation with the County Welfare Directors Association of California, federally recognized tribes located in California, and the departments Tribal Advisory Committee. In selecting the pilot counties, the department shall promote diversity among the participating counties in terms of size and geographic location. The counties shall include, at a minimum, one county in southern California, one county in northern California, and one county in a rural area of the state.(B) The department may proceed with the pilot program if fewer than five counties volunteer for the program or the volunteer counties do not satisfy the geographic diversity provisions, provided the department determines there is adequate participation in the pilot program from the volunteering county or counties to produce useful data and results. If a county begins the pilot program and drops out before the program is complete, the department may continue the pilot program in the remaining counties.(2) The department shall, in consultation with county child welfare agencies, federally recognized tribes located in California, and other stakeholders, as appropriate, establish a working group to develop recommendations to the department regarding the development of procedures necessary to implement and evaluate the pilot programs for each county.(b) (1) A county that receives funding pursuant to this section shall utilize a blind removal strategy when deciding whether a child should be removed from the physical custody of their parent or guardian.(2) A county that receives funding pursuant to this section shall include, but shall not be limited to, a program whereby at any meeting of the county child welfare agency during which the removal of a child from the childs home is discussed, all of the following information shall be redacted from the case file in preparation for the removal decision and may not be referenced:(A) The name of the child and the childs parents.(B) The gender of the childs parents.(C) The race or ethnicity of the child and the childs parents.(D) The sexual orientation of the childs parents.(E) The address of the child and the childs parents.(F) The income of the childs parents.(3) All redacted identifying information shall be available for all other purposes throughout the local child welfare agencys involvement with the child, including, but not limited to, evaluations, provision of services, compliance with requirements pursuant to the federal Indian Child Welfare Act of 1978 (25 U.S.C. Sec. 1901 et seq.), and court proceedings.(4) The blind removal strategy shall not be used in any case involving the emergency removal of a child from the physical custody of their parent or guardian.(c) (1) County participation in the pilot program is voluntary.(2) A participating county may implement the pilot for all or a portion of its emergency response program. The county shall not be required to reimburse the state for any expenses incurred as a result of their early exit from the pilot program. The department may continue to implement the pilot program if less than five counties remain in the pilot program after its commencement.(3) Each county is encouraged, but not required, to take actions in addition to those specified in this section that support the goal of promoting racial equity and advancing practices of equity and inclusion in the child welfare system.(d) (1) The department shall conduct at least one evaluation of the participating counties pilot programs and their impact and effectiveness after 18 months of implementation and again after three years of implementation, and shall submit the information from the evaluation in a report to the Legislature within six months after those periods of implementation. The evaluation shall include, but not be limited to, monitoring the countys effect on the rate of Black, Native American, and Latinx children who were removed from their parents home.(2) A report to be submitted pursuant to paragraph (1) shall be submitted in compliance with Section 9795 of the Government Code.(e) For purposes of this section, blind removal strategy means redacting the demographic information described in paragraph (2) of subdivision (b) from the investigative report in order to eliminate implicit bias in the decisionmaking process of determining whether a child should be removed from the physical custody of their parent or guardian.(f) Nothing in this section, or in the implementation of the pilot program, shall exempt any county or private party from complying with all provisions of the federal Indian Child Welfare Act of 1978 (25 U.S.C. Sec. 1901 et seq.) or state laws implementing the federal Indian Child Welfare Act of 1978. (g) This section shall remain in effect only until January 1, 2027, and as of that date is repealed. | |
| 69 | 66 | ||
| 70 | 67 | ||
| 71 | 68 | ||
| 72 | - | 324.6. (a) (1) (A) On or before July 1, 2023, the State Department of Social Services shall, upon appropriation by the Legislature for the express purpose of this section, establish a three-year pilot program for participating counties for the purpose of addressing racial disparities in the child welfare system in up to five counties, which shall be selected to participate on a voluntary basis in the pilot program according to criteria developed by the department, in consultation with the County Welfare Directors Association of California, federally recognized tribes located in California, and the departments Tribal Advisory Committee. In selecting the pilot counties, the department shall promote diversity among the participating counties in terms of size and geographic location. The counties shall include, at a minimum, one county in southern California, one county in northern California, and one county in a rural area of the state. | |
| 69 | + | 324.6. (a) (1) (A) On or before July 1, 2023, the State Department of Social Services shall shall, upon appropriation by the Legislature for the express purpose of this section, establish a three-year pilot program for participating counties for the purpose of addressing racial disparities in the child welfare system in up to five counties, which shall be selected to participate on a voluntary basis in the pilot program according to criteria developed by the department, in consultation with the County Welfare Directors Association of California, federally recognized tribes located in California, and the departments Tribal Advisory Committee. In selecting the pilot counties, the department shall promote diversity among the participating counties in terms of size and geographic location. The counties shall include, at a minimum, one county in southern California, one county in northern California, and one county in a rural area of the state. | |
| 73 | 70 | ||
| 74 | 71 | (B) The department may proceed with the pilot program if fewer than five counties volunteer for the program or the volunteer counties do not satisfy the geographic diversity provisions, provided the department determines there is adequate participation in the pilot program from the volunteering county or counties to produce useful data and results. If a county begins the pilot program and drops out before the program is complete, the department may continue the pilot program in the remaining counties. | |
| 75 | 72 | ||
| 76 | 73 | (2) The department shall, in consultation with county child welfare agencies, federally recognized tribes located in California, and other stakeholders, as appropriate, establish a working group to develop recommendations to the department regarding the development of procedures necessary to implement and evaluate the pilot programs for each county. | |
| 77 | 74 | ||
| 78 | 75 | (b) (1) A county that receives funding pursuant to this section shall utilize a blind removal strategy when deciding whether a child should be removed from the physical custody of their parent or guardian. | |
| 79 | 76 | ||
| 80 | 77 | (2) A county that receives funding pursuant to this section shall include, but shall not be limited to, a program whereby at any meeting of the county child welfare agency during which the removal of a child from the childs home is discussed, all of the following information shall be redacted from the case file in preparation for the removal decision and may not be referenced: | |
| 81 | 78 | ||
| 82 | 79 | (A) The name of the child and the childs parents. | |
| 83 | 80 | ||
| 84 | 81 | (B) The gender of the childs parents. | |
| 85 | 82 | ||
| 86 | 83 | (C) The race or ethnicity of the child and the childs parents. | |
| 87 | 84 | ||
| 88 | 85 | (D) The sexual orientation of the childs parents. | |
| 89 | 86 | ||
| 90 | 87 | (E) The address of the child and the childs parents. | |
| 91 | 88 | ||
| 92 | 89 | (F) The income of the childs parents. | |
| 93 | 90 | ||
| 94 | 91 | (3) All redacted identifying information shall be available for all other purposes throughout the local child welfare agencys involvement with the child, including, but not limited to, evaluations, provision of services, compliance with requirements pursuant to the federal Indian Child Welfare Act of 1978 (25 U.S.C. Sec. 1901 et seq.), and court proceedings. | |
| 95 | 92 | ||
| 96 | 93 | (4) The blind removal strategy shall not be used in any case involving the emergency removal of a child from the physical custody of their parent or guardian. | |
| 97 | 94 | ||
| 98 | 95 | (c) (1) County participation in the pilot program is voluntary. | |
| 99 | 96 | ||
| 100 | 97 | (2) A participating county may implement the pilot for all or a portion of its emergency response program. The county shall not be required to reimburse the state for any expenses incurred as a result of their early exit from the pilot program. The department may continue to implement the pilot program if less than five counties remain in the pilot program after its commencement. | |
| 101 | 98 | ||
| 102 | 99 | (3) Each county is encouraged, but not required, to take actions in addition to those specified in this section that support the goal of promoting racial equity and advancing practices of equity and inclusion in the child welfare system. | |
| 103 | 100 | ||
| 104 | 101 | (d) (1) The department shall conduct at least one evaluation of the participating counties pilot programs and their impact and effectiveness after 18 months of implementation and again after three years of implementation, and shall submit the information from the evaluation in a report to the Legislature within six months after those periods of implementation. The evaluation shall include, but not be limited to, monitoring the countys effect on the rate of Black, Native American, and Latinx children who were removed from their parents home. | |
| 105 | 102 | ||
| 106 | 103 | (2) A report to be submitted pursuant to paragraph (1) shall be submitted in compliance with Section 9795 of the Government Code. | |
| 107 | 104 | ||
| 108 | 105 | (e) For purposes of this section, blind removal strategy means redacting the demographic information described in paragraph (2) of subdivision (b) from the investigative report in order to eliminate implicit bias in the decisionmaking process of determining whether a child should be removed from the physical custody of their parent or guardian. | |
| 109 | 106 | ||
| 110 | 107 | (f) Nothing in this section, or in the implementation of the pilot program, shall exempt any county or private party from complying with all provisions of the federal Indian Child Welfare Act of 1978 (25 U.S.C. Sec. 1901 et seq.) or state laws implementing the federal Indian Child Welfare Act of 1978. | |
| 111 | 108 | ||
| 112 | 109 | (g) This section shall remain in effect only until January 1, 2027, and as of that date is repealed. |