California 2021-2022 Regular Session

California Assembly Bill AB2687

Introduced
2/18/22  
Introduced
2/18/22  
Refer
3/10/22  
Refer
3/10/22  
Report Pass
4/21/22  
Report Pass
4/21/22  
Refer
4/25/22  
Refer
4/25/22  
Report Pass
4/26/22  
Report Pass
4/26/22  
Engrossed
5/25/22  
Engrossed
5/25/22  
Refer
5/26/22  
Refer
6/8/22  
Refer
6/8/22  
Report Pass
6/16/22  
Report Pass
6/16/22  
Refer
6/16/22  
Refer
6/16/22  
Report Pass
6/28/22  
Report Pass
6/28/22  
Enrolled
8/18/22  
Enrolled
8/18/22  
Chaptered
9/2/22  
Chaptered
9/2/22  

Caption

California Massage Therapy Council.

Impact

The bill's amendments primarily influence the structure and authority of the California Massage Therapy Council, particularly in how it appoints its members. This can impact local hiring practices and increase representation from different governmental and professional perspectives, leading to potentially more diverse oversight of massage therapy practices. Additionally, it redefines requirements for certification, thereby potentially broadening access to those wishing to practice massage therapy in California, particularly those with foreign or non-traditional educational backgrounds.

Summary

Assembly Bill No. 2687 aims to amend several sections of the Business and Professions Code pertaining to the California Massage Therapy Council and the certification processes for massage therapists. It extends the operational timeframe of the Massage Therapy Act until January 1, 2027, allowing the council to continue regulating practices around massage therapy. Key changes include the ability for the council to appoint members who represent various local government and legal entities and allowing for the acceptance of academic credits from non-approved schools under specific circumstances, thereby increasing flexibility in certification processes for applicants.

Sentiment

The general sentiment surrounding AB 2687 appears to be positive among those who advocate for streamlined processes and increased access to certification within the massage therapy community. Supporters argue that the bill addresses barriers for aspiring therapists and allows for a more updated approach to certification standards. Conversely, there may be concerns among some stakeholders regarding the lowering of standards or the impact on existing practitioners, but overall, legislative support reflects an understanding of the bill's necessity in modernizing the regulatory framework.

Contention

One notable point of contention may arise from the discretion given to the council regarding the acceptance of education from non-approved schools. While this is aimed at providing greater access for applicants who may have sought education abroad or at schools that faced administrative issues, it could raise concerns about the consistency and quality of education that future massage therapists receive. Additionally, the extension of the Massage Therapy Act could lead to discussions about what future regulations might be necessary to ensure continued public safety and professional standards within the industry.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA AB1537

The California Massage Therapy Council.

CA SB314

Massage therapy: certification: credit hours.

CA AB2858

Massage therapy: fees.

CA SB315

California Massage Therapy Council: material for non-English speakers.

CA AB1504

California Massage Therapy Council.

CA SB1480

Professions and vocations.

CA SB1451

Professions and vocations.