California 2021-2022 Regular Session

California Assembly Bill AB2751

Introduced
2/18/22  
Refer
3/17/22  
Refer
3/17/22  
Report Pass
4/6/22  
Report Pass
4/6/22  
Refer
4/7/22  
Refer
4/7/22  
Report Pass
4/19/22  
Report Pass
4/19/22  
Refer
4/20/22  
Report Pass
4/28/22  
Report Pass
4/28/22  
Refer
5/3/22  
Refer
5/3/22  
Refer
5/18/22  
Refer
5/18/22  
Report Pass
5/19/22  
Report Pass
5/19/22  
Engrossed
5/25/22  
Engrossed
5/25/22  
Refer
5/26/22  
Refer
5/26/22  
Refer
6/1/22  

Caption

Affordable Internet and Net Equality Act of 2022.

Impact

This bill is designed to address digital equity by ensuring that low-income families can access essential online services, including education and healthcare. By requiring ISPs to advertise their offerings and establish means for eligible households to enroll, AB 2751 aims for widespread adoption of affordable internet. The bill sets ambitious goals for service uptake, aiming for 90% of eligible households to acquire service by 2024 and 95% by 2027. The implications of reality would enhance the connectivity of those traditionally marginalized by the digital divide.

Summary

Assembly Bill 2751, known as the Affordable Internet and Net Equality Act of 2022, promotes accessible internet services for low-income households in California. The bill mandates that state agencies exclusively engage with internet service providers (ISPs) that offer affordable home internet service for households participating in specific public assistance programs. These services must be priced at no more than $40 per month and meet stipulated minimum speed requirements, thus providing a baseline for broadband access across the state.

Sentiment

Overall sentiment surrounding AB 2751 appears largely positive among supporters who view it as a necessary step to bridge the digital gap. Advocacy groups, educators, and representatives from low-income communities have praised its intent to make broadband access a concrete reality. However, there may be concerns about the adequacy of outreach and the capacity of ISPs to meet the demands of increased enrollments, as well as skepticism about whether the $40 cap is sufficient given current market trends.

Contention

Notably, the bill has faced questions regarding its regulatory framework, including how effectively it can oversee ISP compliance in delivering these services. Critics may argue that the focus on public assistance households could overlook broader strategies needed to enhance universal access. Additionally, the operational logistics for ISPs to report on their progress toward these goals may pose challenges in execution, inviting ongoing scrutiny of how well the program will function in practice.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA AB1588

State and federal lifeline programs: eligible telecommunications carrier designations: expedited process.

CA SB1179

Affordable Internet and Net Equality Act of 2024.

CA SB424

The Broadband Infrastructure Grant Account and Federal Funding Account.

CA AB353

Communications: broadband internet service providers: affordable home internet.

CA AB570

Communications: broadband services: California Advanced Services Fund.

CA AB14

Communications: California Advanced Services Fund: deaf and disabled telecommunications program: surcharges.

CA AB1409

California Teleconnect Fund Administrative Committee Fund: Digital Divide Grant Program: homework gap projects.

CA SB716

California Home Internet LifeLine Act of 2025.