Communications: broadband internet service providers: affordable home internet.
The introduction of AB 353 is anticipated to significantly impact the landscape of internet accessibility in California by ensuring that low-income residents can obtain affordable internet services. This measure aligns with existing laws aimed at promoting digital equity, and it will compel ISPs to report annually on their affordable offerings and the households impacted by these services. The goal is to reduce barriers to online access, especially critical for students and families relying on the internet for education and healthcare during times of remote engagement.
Assembly Bill 353, introduced by Assembly Member Boerner, aims to enhance digital equity in California by mandating that all internet service providers (ISPs) offer affordable home internet services to eligible households. The legislation defines 'affordable home internet service' as a plan costing no more than $15 per month, which must meet certain minimum speed requirements of at least 100 megabits per second downstream and 20 megabits per second upstream. This bill seeks to ensure that households participating in qualified public assistance programs have access to necessary and reasonably priced internet services. The law, known as the California Affordable Home Internet Act of 2025, will come into effect on January 1, 2027.
The sentiment surrounding AB 353 is largely positive among proponents of digital equity and expansive broadband access. Supporters argue that this legislation will help bridge the digital divide, providing lower-income families the internet access necessary for modern life, including education and telehealth services. However, some concerns have been raised regarding the feasibility and implementation of the bill, particularly from ISPs about the potential financial burden of offering such services at significantly reduced rates.
Notable points of contention include the challenge of ensuring that the affordable internet service requirements do not compromise service quality or lead to unsustainable business practices for ISPs. There are also concerns around the scope of 'eligible households' and the verification processes that must be established to manage these public assistance programs. While the bill aims to enhance access, it raises questions about how effectively it can be implemented without placing undue strain on both the ISPs and low-income residents seeking to benefit from these programs.