California 2021-2022 Regular Session

California Assembly Bill AB2780

Introduced
2/18/22  
Refer
3/24/22  
Report Pass
3/24/22  
Refer
3/28/22  
Report Pass
4/25/22  
Refer
4/26/22  
Report Pass
5/4/22  
Engrossed
5/12/22  
Refer
5/12/22  
Refer
5/25/22  
Report Pass
6/22/22  
Enrolled
8/30/22  
Chaptered
9/27/22  

Caption

Dissolution of redevelopment agencies: enhanced infrastructure financing districts: City of Selma.

Impact

If enacted, AB 2780 would empower Selma to initiate projects aimed at enhancing public capital, which may include improvements to housing, social services centers, and initiatives to bolster climate resilience. The ability to bypass the finding of completion requirement is a significant alteration of the standard procedures for cities with dissolved redevelopment agencies, reflecting a tailored approach to meet specific local needs and revitalize the community.

Summary

Assembly Bill 2780 addresses the legal framework surrounding the dissolution of redevelopment agencies in California, specifically targeting the City of Selma. The bill amends existing government code to allow Selma to establish and govern enhanced infrastructure financing districts, even if they have not received a formal finding of completion from the state auditor, which is typically required for cities that previously had redevelopment agencies. This is seen as a legislative effort to give Selma the tools needed to boost economic development and financial resilience in the face of unique challenges.

Sentiment

The sentiment around AB 2780 appears supportive among Selma's local government officials and stakeholders who view the bill as a crucial step towards economic recovery and community improvement. There is an understanding that Selma requires special provisions to address its financial difficulties and to develop infrastructure that benefits the entire community. However, there may be skepticism regarding the impact of such enhancements on long-term fiscal management and local governance.

Contention

Notably, the bill recognizes that a general statute cannot be applied due to the uniqueness of Selma's financial circumstances, suggesting that there are broader implications of this legislative approach that could set a precedent for how other cities manage their redevelopment processes. While the intentions are likely aimed at fostering growth, it raises questions about equity and the consistency of regulations across California's cities in similar situations.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA AB1259

Dissolution of redevelopment agencies: enhanced infrastructure financing districts: City of Merced.

CA SB1389

Public investment authorities.

CA SB593

Redevelopment: successor agency debt: City and County of San Francisco.

CA SB15

Property tax revenue allocations: Local-State Sustainable Investment Program.

CA AB3009

Redevelopment: successor agencies: administrative cost allowance.

CA AB1332

Accessory dwelling units: preapproved plans.

CA SB736

Validations.

CA SB735

Validations.