California 2021-2022 Regular Session

California Assembly Bill AB768

Introduced
2/16/21  
Introduced
2/16/21  
Refer
2/25/21  
Refer
2/25/21  
Report Pass
3/11/21  
Refer
3/15/21  
Refer
3/15/21  
Failed
2/1/22  

Caption

School safety: aquatic and pool safety program: model policy.

Impact

One significant impact of AB 768 is the requirement for local educational agencies, which include school districts and charter schools, to implement the aquatic safety program. This introduces state-mandated guidelines that these agencies must follow, which may lead to increased oversight on training and safety protocols in aquatic contexts. Furthermore, the bill stipulates that educational agencies review their safety programs every four years, encouraging ongoing evaluation and potential updates to align with best practices in aquatic safety.

Summary

Assembly Bill 768, introduced by Assembly Member Holden, focuses on improving school safety through the establishment of a comprehensive aquatic and pool safety program. The bill mandates the development of this model policy by the Division of Boating and Waterways and the State Department of Public Health in cooperation with educational bodies and relevant organizations. It emphasizes the importance of addressing the specific needs of children at higher risk of drowning and ensures that the program is tailored to be age-appropriate. Notably, the bill aims to provide this service to local educational agencies at no cost.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding AB 768 appears to be supportive overall, especially given the alarming statistics regarding child drowning rates, particularly among certain demographics. The dialogue highlights a shared concern for children’s safety and acknowledges the essential role that educational settings can play in preventive measures. However, some critics may question the cost implications for local agencies, as state mandates often come with financial burdens, necessitating clarity on reimbursement processes.

Contention

Despite the general support, there may be points of contention regarding the additional requirements placed on local educational agencies. Some stakeholders might argue that imposing a state-mandated local program could strain already limited resources or divert attention from other critical safety programs. Additionally, the effective implementation of the bill hinges on the quality and accessibility of the materials developed and the subsequent training provided to educators, making it essential to monitor these aspects carefully as the bill progresses.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Previously Filed As

CA SB552

Public safety: pools and spas.

CA AB1445

The Neng Thao Drowning Prevention Safety Act.

CA AB960

School safety: web-based or app-based school safety programs.

CA SB643

School safety: Safe-To-Tell Program.

CA AB1299

School safety: school resource officers: school police officers: school safety plans.

CA SB323

Comprehensive school safety plans: individualized safety plans.

CA AB2828

Child health and safety: “Have a Heart, Be a Star, Help Our Kids” license plate program.

CA AB2866

Pool safety: State Department of Social Services regulated facilities.

CA SB608

Child health and safety: “Have a Heart, Be a Star, Help Our Kids” license plate program.

CA AB2816

School safety: School Mapping Data Grant Program.

Similar Bills

CA AB555

California state preschool programs: reimbursement amounts: adjustment factors.

CA SB127

Early childhood: childcare and education.

CA AB210

Early childhood: childcare and education.

CA AB1363

Preschool: dual language learners.

CA AB563

Childcare: Early Childhood Policy Council.

CA AB123

Early childhood education: childcare and development programs.

CA AB22

Preschool data: data collection.

CA AB185

Education finance: education omnibus trailer bill.