California Assembly Bill AB777

California 2021-2022 Regular Session

• Introduced: 2/16/21
• Refer: 2/25/21
• Report Pass: 4/19/21
• Refer: 4/20/21
• Report Pass: 5/4/21
• Refer: 5/6/21
• Refer: 5/19/21
• Report Pass: 5/20/21
• Engrossed: 6/2/21
• Refer: 6/3/21
• Refer: 6/16/21
• Report Pass: 6/22/21
• Refer: 6/22/21
• Report Pass: 7/8/21
• Refer: 7/8/21
• Refer: 7/15/21
• Report Pass: 8/26/21
• Enrolled: 8/31/22
• Vetoed: 9/28/22

Caption

State property: transfer: University of California.

Impact

The bill aims to streamline the process of transferring excess state property by designating it for priority use in housing, thus tackling housing shortages faced by students and staff at the University of California. Furthermore, by mandating the use of a skilled workforce and adherence to prevailing wage laws, the bill seeks to enhance employment standards in public works projects. This reflects a broader legislative intent to invest in public infrastructure that supports education and community needs.

Summary

AB777, introduced by Assembly Member McCarty, addresses the transfer of state property to the University of California for specific purposes, particularly to facilitate the provision of below market rental housing for students, staff, and faculty at UC Davis. It amends sections of the Education Code and Government Code, emphasizing the need to make compliance reports public records and establishing criteria for the contractors involved in any projects under this bill. The transfer of property includes requirements that ensure a skilled and trained workforce is utilized for construction work, requiring all contractors and subcontractors to pay prevailing wages.

Sentiment

Overall, the sentiment around AB777 appears positive, particularly among those advocating for increased access to affordable housing solutions. Supporters argue that this bill is a significant step toward making higher education more accessible by easing the housing burden on students and staff. However, concerns regarding the funding and administration of the ongoing costs associated with this property transfer linger among some stakeholders.

Contention

While the bill has strong support, contention arises regarding the level of oversight and accountability provided in the execution of the housing plans and the associated costs. There are considerations about the effectiveness of enforcing prevailing wage requirements, especially with penalties for non-compliance. Some legislators and public interest groups have expressed apprehensions about whether adequate measures are in place to ensure that the property will be developed for its intended purposes, emphasizing the importance of rigorous planning and execution timelines.