California 2023-2024 Regular Session

California Assembly Bill AB930

Introduced
2/14/23  
Refer
3/2/23  
Report Pass
4/11/23  
Report Pass
4/11/23  
Refer
4/12/23  
Refer
4/12/23  
Report Pass
4/20/23  
Report Pass
4/20/23  
Refer
4/20/23  
Report Pass
4/25/23  
Report Pass
4/25/23  
Refer
4/27/23  
Refer
4/27/23  
Refer
1/18/24  
Refer
1/18/24  
Report Pass
1/18/24  
Report Pass
1/18/24  
Engrossed
1/29/24  
Refer
1/29/24  
Refer
1/29/24  
Refer
5/1/24  
Refer
5/1/24  
Report Pass
6/5/24  
Report Pass
6/5/24  
Refer
6/5/24  
Refer
6/5/24  
Report Pass
6/12/24  
Report Pass
6/12/24  
Refer
6/13/24  
Refer
6/13/24  
Report Pass
7/3/24  
Report Pass
7/3/24  
Refer
7/3/24  
Refer
7/3/24  
Refer
8/5/24  

Caption

Local government: infrastructure financing districts: Reinvestment in Infrastructure for a Sustainable and Equitable California (RISE) districts: housing development: restrictive covenants.

Impact

The establishment of RISE districts is expected to have significant implications for local governance and community development. The bill mandates that at least 50% of RISE district funding is allocated to infill supportive infrastructure, and a minimum of 30% to residential units designated for low or moderate income families. This equitable funding structure aims to address the pressing needs for affordable housing in California by leveraging public funds for community-centric projects. Nonetheless, the bill restricts the inclusion of territory in a RISE district, requiring that any participating local government be directly involved, fostering collaboration among municipalities.

Summary

Assembly Bill No. 930, introduced by Assembly Member Friedman, seeks to establish Reinvestment in Infrastructure for a Sustainable and Equitable California (RISE) districts. This bill allows local governments to collaboratively create RISE districts which are aimed at facilitating infrastructure financing and development. Specifically, these districts will support housing development that is affordable to low- and moderate-income residents by issuing bonds and investing in supportive infrastructure. This initiative hopes to streamline the process of developing necessary infrastructure while ensuring that local agencies have a structured way to enhance community vitality.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding AB 930 is predominantly positive among proponents, who view it as a viable solution to contemporary challenges in housing and infrastructure development. Advocates argue that it promotes sustainable growth and community equity, aligning with broader state goals for environmental responsibility and public accessibility. However, there are concerns regarding potential administrative burdens and the extent of local control, as the bill integrates multiple local governments into a single financing structure, which may lead to complexities in governance.

Contention

Notable points of contention include the requirements surrounding funding distribution and the Texas Legislative Budget Committee's oversight role in ensuring that districts adhere to labor and wage standards. The bill specifies that projects financed through RISE districts must adhere to state wage laws, which has raised some debate among construction industry stakeholders regarding compliance costs and the impact on private financing. Additionally, some local governments express concerns over the potential loss of autonomy and the dependencies created by RISE district governance, which may create conflicts if local needs are not adequately represented.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Previously Filed As

CA AB1536

Reinvestment in Infrastructure for a Sustainable and Equitable California (RISE) districts: standards.

CA AB1568

Enhanced infrastructure financing districts.

CA AB761

Local finance: enhanced infrastructure financing districts.

CA SB696

Enhanced infrastructure financing districts: housing: underutilized or deteriorated retail property: covenants and restrictions: eminent domain.

CA SB293

Infrastructure financing districts: formation: issuance of bonds: City of Oakland.

CA SB961

Enhanced infrastructure financing districts.

CA AB2578

Infrastructure financing districts: City and County of San Francisco.

CA SB782

Enhanced infrastructure financing district: climate resilience districts.

CA AB417

Local finance: enhanced infrastructure financing districts: community revitalization and investment authorities.

CA AB56

California Infrastructure and Economic Development Bank: housing.

Similar Bills

CA AB1324

Transit-Oriented Affordable Housing Funding Program Act.

CA SB852

Climate resilience districts: formation: funding mechanisms.

CA SB1512

Housing omnibus.

CA SB597

Labor-related liabilities: direct contractor and subcontractor.

CA AB235

Apprenticeship and preapprenticeship.

CA AB1845

Metropolitan Water District of Southern California: alternative project delivery methods.

CA AB3073

Investor-owned utilities: contracting.

CA AB3210

Affordable Housing on K–12 Lands Act of 2024.