California 2021-2022 Regular Session

California Assembly Bill AB781

Introduced
2/16/21  
Refer
3/4/21  
Report Pass
3/4/21  
Refer
3/8/21  
Report Pass
4/27/21  
Refer
4/27/21  
Refer
4/27/21  
Refer
5/12/21  
Refer
5/12/21  
Report Pass
5/20/21  
Report Pass
5/20/21  
Engrossed
5/27/21  
Engrossed
5/27/21  
Refer
5/28/21  
Refer
5/28/21  
Refer
6/9/21  
Report Pass
6/29/21  
Report Pass
6/29/21  
Refer
6/29/21  
Refer
6/29/21  
Report Pass
7/7/21  
Refer
7/7/21  
Refer
7/7/21  
Refer
8/16/21  
Refer
8/16/21  
Report Pass
8/26/21  
Report Pass
8/26/21  
Enrolled
9/3/21  
Enrolled
9/3/21  
Chaptered
9/24/21  
Chaptered
9/24/21  
Passed
9/24/21  

Caption

Flood control projects: County of Orange: subvention funds.

Impact

If enacted, AB781 would facilitate the allocation of state funds to improve flood control measures in Orange County, helping to mitigate flood risks in the area. The bill aims for a strategic collaboration that aligns local efforts with federal guidelines, thereby enhancing the safety and infrastructure of the community. This provision emphasizes the importance of state and local cooperation in managing water and flood-related issues, ultimately contributing to public safety and environmental stability.

Summary

Assembly Bill No. 781, also known as AB781, is focused on providing subvention funds to the County of Orange for the Westminster, East Garden Grove Flood Risk Management project. The bill adds Section 12687.6 to the Water Code, enabling state financial assistance for specified flood control projects that meet established criteria. The funding is subject to legislative appropriation, and the Department of Water Resources must confirm compliance with specified requirements, which are based on federal recommendations and guidelines.

Sentiment

The general sentiment around AB781 appears to be positive, especially among those prioritizing infrastructure development and community safety. Supporters argue that improved flood control measures are critical for the welfare of residents in affected areas, highlighting the necessity for state involvement in funding such projects. However, some stakeholders may express concerns about liability and the state's lack of financial responsibility should damages occur during or after the project implementation.

Contention

A notable point of contention regarding AB781 is the state's assumption of no liability for damages that might result from the project. This stipulation could raise concerns among local officials and residents about the risks involved and the protection they have in case of project failures. Furthermore, the requirement for the County of Orange to indemnify the state poses questions about the accountability and management of risks associated with funding and executing flood control initiatives.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA SB881

Flood control: County of Santa Clara: South San Francisco Bay Shoreline Project.

CA AB489

Flood control: state financial assistance: Pajaro River.

CA SB489

Flood management projects: state funding: Pajaro River Flood Risk Management Project.

CA AB2450

Flood control: City of Woodland: Lower Cache Creek.

CA SB496

Flood control: water development projects: Pajaro River.

CA AB896

Flood control: City of Woodland: Lower Cache Creek.

CA SB1009

Mount Shasta Fish Hatchery: lease.