California 2021-2022 Regular Session

California Assembly Bill AB868

Introduced
2/17/21  
Introduced
2/17/21  
Refer
3/18/21  
Refer
3/18/21  
Report Pass
3/18/21  
Refer
3/22/21  
Refer
3/22/21  
Report Pass
4/22/21  
Report Pass
4/22/21  
Refer
4/22/21  
Report Pass
4/28/21  
Report Pass
4/28/21  
Refer
4/28/21  
Refer
4/28/21  
Refer
5/12/21  
Report Pass
5/20/21  
Report Pass
5/20/21  
Engrossed
6/1/21  
Refer
6/2/21  
Refer
6/16/21  
Report Pass
6/25/21  
Refer
6/25/21  
Report Pass
4/4/22  
Refer
4/4/22  
Refer
4/4/22  
Refer
4/5/22  
Refer
4/5/22  
Report Pass
5/9/22  
Report Pass
5/9/22  
Refer
5/9/22  
Refer
5/9/22  
Refer
5/18/22  

Caption

State milkshake: date shakes.

Impact

The passage of AB 868 would formally establish the date shake in California's Government Code as the state's official milkshake, thus promoting its recognition at a statewide level. This move is likely to support local businesses that specialize in date shakes, encouraging tourism in areas known for this beverage. Furthermore, it reflects a broader effort to celebrate and preserve local traditions and products in the state's cultural heritage, thereby enhancing community identity and pride among residents of the Coachella Valley.

Summary

Assembly Bill 868, introduced by Assembly Member Eduardo Garcia, aims to designate the date shake as the official state milkshake of California. This bill recognizes the cultural and historical significance of date shakes, particularly in the Coachella Valley, where they originated. The legislation highlights how date shakes are not only a popular local beverage but also emblematic of the region’s economy and tourism, serving as a hallmark of local fairs and festivals, such as the National Date Festival and the Coachella Valley Music and Arts Festival.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding AB 868 has generally been positive, with broad support from local constituents who view this designation as a celebration of their cultural traditions. Proponents argue that the bill reinforces local identity and economic opportunities linked to the tourism sector. However, some voices may question the necessity of such official designations, suggesting that they divert attention from more pressing legislative issues, though overall, the community seems united in favor of recognizing the significance of date shakes.

Contention

While there has been significant support for AB 868, it may not be without contention. Some critics may argue that while the designation is well-intended, it does not address larger economic or social issues facing the community. They might advocate for legislative efforts that provide more substantial benefits or protections for local businesses and tourism rather than symbolic gestures. However, the absence of major opposition during the voting process indicates that the bill resonates well with the majority, reflecting a collective appreciation for this local delicacy.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA AB3198

Joint powers agreements: retail electric services.

CA AB2629

Imperial Irrigation District: retail electric service.

CA AB2272

State highways: relinquishment.

CA AB1262

California Gang, Crime, and Violence Prevention Partnership Program.

CA AB2757

Southeast California Economic Region.

CA SB534

Green Empowerment Zone for the Salton Sea and Southeastern Desert Valleys.

CA SB482

Salton Sea: long-term strategy.

CA AB1021

Imperial Irrigation District.