While primarily a technical update, AB 947 emphasizes the definition of 'derivative victims' and makes nonsubstantive changes to reinforce clarity around the eligibility for those seeking compensation. This could impact how victims or surviving family members apply for and receive compensation, thereby enhancing their access to restitution from the state’s Restitution Fund. Furthermore, it reiterates that eligibility does not exclude individuals based on the felon status of the primary victim, which helps broaden the reach of the compensation to those affected by crimes.
Assembly Bill 947, introduced by Assembly Member Nazarian, seeks to amend Section 13955 of the Government Code, which pertains to victim compensation in California. The bill maintains the existing framework that allows for the compensation of victims and derivative victims of specific crimes through the California Victim Compensation Board. It outlines eligibility requirements that include specific conditions pertaining to the residency of the victims and the nature of the crime. The bill aims to ensure that appropriate compensation is accessible to all qualifying victims, within the bounds of existing laws.
AB 947 is positioned as a non-controversial bill due to its nonsubstantive nature; however, discussions around victim compensation often bring up broader issues within the criminal justice system, such as the sufficiency of funds for victim services, the emotional toll on victims and their families, and the necessary protections versus the rights of criminal defendants. While there may not be direct opposition to this amendment, the ongoing debate regarding the balance of crime victim support and broader criminal justice reforms continues to be a context within which this bill operates.