California 2021-2022 Regular Session

California Assembly Bill AB974

Introduced
2/18/21  
Introduced
2/18/21  
Refer
3/4/21  
Refer
3/4/21  
Report Pass
4/6/21  
Report Pass
4/6/21  
Refer
4/7/21  
Refer
4/7/21  
Report Pass
4/13/21  
Report Pass
4/13/21  
Refer
4/13/21  
Report Pass
5/5/21  
Report Pass
5/5/21  
Engrossed
5/13/21  
Engrossed
5/13/21  
Refer
5/13/21  
Refer
5/13/21  
Refer
5/27/21  
Refer
5/27/21  
Report Pass
6/15/21  
Report Pass
6/15/21  
Refer
6/15/21  
Report Pass
6/30/21  
Refer
6/30/21  
Refer
6/30/21  
Enrolled
9/1/21  
Chaptered
9/16/21  
Chaptered
9/16/21  

Caption

Equestrian safety.

Impact

AB 974 modifies existing vehicle code provisions to incorporate equestrian safety regulations, specifically targeting minors. By enforcing helmet usage and visibility requirements at night, the bill imposes a state-mandated local program. Though the monetary penalty for violations is set at a maximum of $25, the bill also introduces shared financial liability for parents or guardians of minors who violate these regulations. This shift indicates a commitment to protecting youth while riding on public roadways, connecting equestrian activities more closely with traffic safety laws.

Summary

Assembly Bill 974, introduced by Luz Rivas, enhances equestrian safety on paved highways in California. The bill mandates that individuals under 18 years must wear a properly fitted and fastened helmet while riding an equestrian animal on these roads. Furthermore, it requires that riders, regardless of age, use reflective gear or lamps emitting white light during nighttime. The aim of the legislation is to increase safety for young equestrians, reflecting a proactive stance on preventing accidents and enhancing visibility for both horse riders and drivers.

Sentiment

The general sentiment around AB 974 appears supportive, especially among safety advocates and parents concerned about the welfare of young riders. Proponents argue that the implementation of these safety measures will help prevent injuries and fatalities associated with horseback riding in traffic environments. However, there may be minor contention regarding the enforcement of these regulations, particularly in rural areas where horseback riding is more common and cultural practices may resist regulatory measures. Concerns about the financial liability on guardians for infractions could also evoke mixed feelings among some stakeholders.

Contention

While AB 974 seeks to improve safety, it may face pushback from individuals who view the mandate for helmets and reflective gear as unnecessary or overly restrictive. Opponents could argue that the bill imposes on personal freedom and traditional practices in equestrian culture. Additionally, there is potential concern regarding enforcement and whether local authorities will have adequate resources to oversee compliance effectively, particularly in less populated areas where equestrian activity is prevalent.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA SB322

Urban equestrian initiative zones.

CA AB1773

Vehicles: electric bicycles.

NJ S1260

Requires use of protective headgear when horseback riding on State-owned lands.

NJ S2247

Requires use of protective headgear when horseback riding on State-owned lands.

NJ A2630

Requires use of protective headgear when horseback riding on State-owned lands.

CA AB1909

Vehicles: bicycle omnibus bill.

CO SB149

Local Government Duties Equestrian Protections

CA AB1017

Homelessness: Striking Worker Emergency Homelessness Prevention program.